Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label statements

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 30 March 2020 22:48 UTC

Return-Path: <010001712da22206-5abfb31e-aa12-47b6-983a-1cd6edf6d45b-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F1033A14F8 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:48:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.004
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.004 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TTtQbFiN518f for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:48:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from a48-90.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-90.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.90]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECB603A14F2 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Mar 2020 15:48:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1585608532; h=From:Message-Id:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:Feedback-ID; bh=L2TwNczJZNySPulaBkvqsGNF0DwuNi9Hy39yiWqkilo=; b=aVg3R83/qr+d2OL1jUgxC5J0AdibyA3r/sK494NLPzZF7TnyadnWRlbJBCl8kbLi jq0Fq/LugeTGTXL8DyZQjLjNhRtkjkNKBezl9Pg5Y5OSgiwqwCAqmpAtkYg3jFNKvK1 Fl41O1SovMytqvPcxkYPlX7PNNTmIsatKE+0b7i8=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Message-ID: <010001712da22206-5abfb31e-aa12-47b6-983a-1cd6edf6d45b-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_873E96A0-C043-4887-B418-B0C0C38900AA"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\))
Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:48:52 +0000
In-Reply-To: <20200328.094121.1160081114435152145.id@4668.se>
Cc: rrahman@cisco.com, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
To: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Bj=C3=B6rklund?= <mbj+ietf@4668.se>
References: <75CFDBD9-143C-407A-B7C3-26CEC51E229C@cisco.com> <20200328.094121.1160081114435152145.id@4668.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2020.03.30-54.240.48.90
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/vKWAt9Qv8QNGzJNjvFKjVJKrdXo>
Subject: Re: [netmod] All IETF YANG modules MUST include revision-label statements
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2020 22:48:55 -0000

[I’ve scanned the entire thread before circling back to respond to this message]


> Martin writes:

> I can reluctantly accept that modified smever is published as
> Experimental.  But that doesn't mean that IETF modules should use it.

I assume Martin’s reference to Experimental follows my adoption-call comment here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uZZqBs1yK0EpbXgRJRFQihHWo5s/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/uZZqBs1yK0EpbXgRJRFQihHWo5s/>

Changing the "Intended Status” for an adopted document is easily done at any time before publication.

PS: Andy didn’t participate in the call, though he appears to be coming in strong now...

Kent