Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)
Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> Mon, 23 October 2017 15:22 UTC
Return-Path: <andy@yumaworks.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15D8139428 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:22:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dq3GSi30Cqg9 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-lf0-x234.google.com (mail-lf0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45757139432 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-lf0-x234.google.com with SMTP id a69so20572669lfe.5 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:22:01 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yumaworks-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kPBpqutwShsFjcjPx3jQy3C3GHG7mQaRaaBcl2kn/tY=; b=IrygZh4gggOxKfn9pm7NdcrwdQxumue/cTDbbHahpxVy/Nr2hyTmwlKjGGDIy339nc S+ClsRDp+hCgFOWcstysMefsijplzP2SAwKmgPPxQVbN746w/JKJ0QdEUiFncc/izraX 4gsT24SuFgfnNMlq01JMcY+gQQZlBwi8knH8BKZ3U4ILDJUAuNWxHdE5DKkgeSZAttMk 2sLz9s9tCelZBj29o6M3YBfoHsMz2a0ggbVybri26ygT5xw9PSJBrpD53PGxmCX11pQH Gnuxf+AlSDe0P+rciJ6CYLTIqXIryIBTTOsytO52ryf1QWCoLMqjiF49gK6aG/2AufhT A4JQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kPBpqutwShsFjcjPx3jQy3C3GHG7mQaRaaBcl2kn/tY=; b=aFxR1C/fD8FAih1s+ZM4zCsQMiHFDQUt5QERUPPC7+6nFWkNxuuyjlZLqcMy+xkm/p zqvvOcXhi3bpBQUcVGXhsy27+Bf4bHv44M6HVnxCh+PsZ04OWZersO98z8QRslt0YLSO 14/0pyHfnuQkQHrybvnCqnsdp7NCajynh/QH055QqJUdM9UBnzolPG7i5dP6VagUSOzw NPoksfBHF5YBn2UGqZpjC7oFpJEKm2bCsd5UfvJV5skqvXQdM3iETEeYAhZzkIhtHHg3 rK+ja4YoNQc9Kk6J/3QV7IuajonLkyQT+0SvtzkSukdSGmr5R8rUwbuyUuG0udO3RRDo eKgw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AMCzsaXoqaNi7RWJh7eIhtOq8zTlEQ4fZ4b2wlG+cVhghEHRForDPXpg l1JM+QzgUSY6qVP1/jY5IYBMI8RGhNdFA5JFHh0WEg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABhQp+RVOwfeRvmoo34of3fBWKsecSwdIpeO3R9vMAqGVuCZTbR8zI85Gft/QKkM/UP4OX17A0gzpXwWWuRBZhnYpLU=
X-Received: by 10.46.85.136 with SMTP id g8mr5251851lje.84.1508772119408; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:21:59 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.25.150.198 with HTTP; Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:21:58 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20171023.163039.1034668943501669872.mbj@tail-f.com>
References: <67172aec-686f-90ba-0fc8-1ce2bc3dcdb4@cisco.com> <20171023.103513.1336510497564838401.mbj@tail-f.com> <CABCOCHRqG9DNJf9q0xG1x+Rjy3oAAOoh1EawcCLQwwy=edHk3g@mail.gmail.com> <20171023.163039.1034668943501669872.mbj@tail-f.com>
From: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 08:21:58 -0700
Message-ID: <CABCOCHTgG-GD1-nubQ81kZog1xnHmTD2KJB38s03qGny4CAV1g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com>
Cc: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, Berger Lou <lberger@labn.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c1cdc4439b60d055c386258"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/vR-_TkwVko2zCB9Y9ayFOww1Yws>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (5157)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2017 15:22:04 -0000
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 7:30 AM, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> wrote: > Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> wrote: > > On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 1:35 AM, Martin Bjorklund <mbj@tail-f.com> > wrote: > > > > > Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> wrote: > > > > Dear all, > > > > > > > > Shall I validate this one? > > > > > > No I don't think this is correct. We choose a quoted string to be > > > able to correctly represent all YANG integer and decimal64 values. > > > Note that XPath doesn't have integers, just 64-bit floats. This means > > > that not all 64-bit integers can be expressed as numbers in XPath. > > > > > > > > It's OK to leave this out since it requires a code change. > > > > > > Read sec. 2.3 again: > > Wrong thread? > No -- customers who know XPath report this YANG-ism as a bug. It would require 2 lines of code to be changed in our code to accept numbers. I don't think an errata should require a code change. > > > The node test text() is true for any text node. > > Sure, but a node test is not a predicate! > But it returns true/false, not a node-set. The expression /foo[text() = 'fred'] is not the same as /foo[. = 'fred'] > > > /martin > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > /martin > > > > > > > > > > Andy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Regards, Benoit > > > > > The following errata report has been submitted for RFC7950, > > > > > "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language". > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > You may review the report below and at: > > > > > http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5157 > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > Type: Technical > > > > > Reported by: Andy Bierman <andy@yumaworks.com> > > > > > > > > > > Section: 14 > > > > > > > > > > Original Text > > > > > ------------- > > > > > key-predicate-expr = node-identifier *WSP "=" *WSP > quoted-string > > > > > > > > > > Corrected Text > > > > > -------------- > > > > > key-predicate-expr = node-identifier *WSP "=" *WSP > > > > > (quoted-string / integer-value / decimal-value) > > > > > > > > > > Notes > > > > > ----- > > > > > An instance identifier is forced to specify every key value to be a > > > > > string > > > > > even though the YANG key leaf type could be a numeric type. > > > > > XPath does not require a quoted string here, just YANG. > > > > > > > > > > Old: /top/list[idx="4"] > > > > > New: /top/list[idx=4] > > > > > > > > > > Instructions: > > > > > ------------- > > > > > This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, > please > > > > > use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or > > > > > rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party > > > > > can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. > > > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > RFC7950 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6020bis-14) > > > > > -------------------------------------- > > > > > Title : The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language > > > > > Publication Date : August 2016 > > > > > Author(s) : M. Bjorklund, Ed. > > > > > Category : PROPOSED STANDARD > > > > > Source : NETCONF Data Modeling Language > > > > > Area : Operations and Management > > > > > Stream : IETF > > > > > Verifying Party : IESG > > > > > . > > > > > > > > > > > > >
- [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 (515… RFC Errata System
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Benoit Claise
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Martin Bjorklund
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Kent Watsen
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Jan Lindblad
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Ladislav Lhotka
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Robert Wilton
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Vladimir Vassilev
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Andy Bierman
- Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC7950 … Ladislav Lhotka