Re: [netmod] WGLC on draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-11

[Andy Bierman <[e-mail]>]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 6:01 AM Jürgen Schönwälder <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 05:21:01PM -0700, Andy Bierman wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 4:34 PM Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>
> wrote:
> >
> > > All,
> > >
> > > 1) If you provided WGLC comments on this draft, please review the -12
> diff
> > > <
> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6991-bis-12.txt> to
> > > ensure that the updates made are good.
> > >
> > > 2) Juergen notes below that he also removed the "revision-identifier"
> > > typedef, as it is better
> > > defined in the YANG versioning module.  Any objections?
> > >
> > >
> > Sorry for the late comment.
> > I think Juergen listed one option as "rename to revision-date and leave
> it
> > in this module".
> > I support this option.
> >
> > There is no chance that the revision date format will be changing any
> time
> > soon.
> > This is useful for general applications because revision date is widely
> > used.
> >
>
> The ietf-yang-library module (RFC 8525) currently uses its own
> definition of revision-identifier. While this module could adopt a
> common definition, the value of such a change is minor.
>
> The question where we place the definition of revision-date is likely
> a matter of which role we expect the versioning work to play in the
> future. I am relatively neutral on the placement.
>
>
Not that important I guess.
One would think the "date" typedef already in the draft would be useful,
but it isn't, and therefore not used.
There is no typedef for the pattern YYYY-MM-DD.

/js
>

Andy


>
> --
> Jürgen Schönwälder              Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
> Phone: [phone]         Campus Ring 1 | 28759 Bremen | Germany
> Fax:   [phone]         <https://www.jacobs-university.de/>
>