Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-03.txt

"Adrian Farrel" <> Mon, 17 June 2019 18:16 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECE5412043A for <>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:16:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.597
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.597 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VtlCBswNBNtu for <>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:16:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B68D120625 for <>; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 11:16:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x5HIGcPk007130; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 19:16:38 +0100
Received: from (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id E122B2203B; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 19:16:37 +0100 (BST)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBBC12203A; Mon, 17 Jun 2019 19:16:37 +0100 (BST)
Received: from LAPTOPK7AS653V ( [] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x5HIGZDK010736 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Jun 2019 19:16:37 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <>
To: 'Kent Watsen' <>,
References: <> <> <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 19:16:34 +0100
Organization: Old Dog Consulting
Message-ID: <01f401d52538$ccb4e0a0$661ea1e0$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01F5_01D52541.2E7B9290"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AQGfH+XDlDQC4lKNSSHBhCWukwulEwG0BD6bArRKtTim6OzCsA==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--18.893-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--18.893-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--18.892700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: IeZYkn8zfFpor4mPA3EMtnFPUrVDm6jtekMgTOQbVFscNByoSo036Yst NWRuMmhq/6GBDyCFWvOTYOlgCg1z9wkCvLLkzMhrmL8m0JtKLVNrYRnU37pu2oDpStszePepH6+ rJrS1zY+QLaoaEKRbU5Yu7wYYdZ8/+Va5jU+CLx7C0TXpqtexIkGaUEX8gnR8UQ+YXiZ8bivSPG dGZObyciYxz8zvRVby++4ndMG9RrlkC6HMwfW/fnCO70QAsBdCfglgnB0nDhORoQLwUmtov51dd xkSC3k368qNWtTEEnI+Jck2RObbKvIQ7OhgkzSdTauf2PrRb1sHgh3sKJBzPyBwR3y4lKPEmwOH FxYq8mcweRiYo8gedbf6+/4c5hJ6GIOWW3Xs9vS9NsL2xEmLy+lUxvXGcRIyT0IkL8xYhngZ0+2 buF3T0jdXCbq8PsRj7GlLKb+3caKxHUyB8D2WwznLV1rDXtKlc3ewuwbSaG5s98Z8fG/6kX1Z+Z qpv/nqG1+TaFaL9Yi3JvBH0Duz9CKSpG+tIlC/yZHnIMmQ+DiDGjRALjlFwkamD+dkC4n9NiiXN Oko0Fuar39byU2evL73xG6zBNMfNzxsYb+2pBltJYfOb0q5O8BjKtUA788trosiTWRhP4mSTQRy O1T1cGWH/va7vNnG/DJoA3ehKO+H/OjJ1CEsvDpJFtl6qyQe/jXn2SHUmVzROD3l4Lgc5TlDcJc ynv4c8ro3Cv/OOP3SSTUvZG6oD+ONxC2CfmlbKO2+bS8WGa2S0Ed+8sr8mnQ8D+SLaQjsS1Tj+k qv+huJmZ8FliAav78tQ+d++9tXYff3A5nWjkaeAiCmPx4NwGmRqNBHmBvevqq8s2MNhPDPPeN6H N6d7M+9+OQ9U/5fIAcCikR3vq/YuAOirZOytiDo8jvia9Yba6L6jSWNg58jZBppKB5kIz+O8vM9 sPap
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-03.txt
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2019 18:16:47 -0000


Thanks for the work.


I had a clear understanding of what "precede a space" means.

I struggle to understand what "on top of" means in a stream of characters. I
wondered whether you were referring to vertical placement on the page (the
text is talking about columns), but that seems crazy!

Do you mean that the fold must not be occupied by a space character?

I think the question is whether it is easier to describe a fold happening
between characters or at a character slot.

The original text used the "between characters" approach. If you prefer to
say you fold at a column, that's fine, but probably "on top of" isn't as
clear as "the column at which we fold must not contain a space".






From: netmod <> On Behalf Of Kent Watsen
Sent: 17 June 2019 18:39
Subject: Re: [netmod] I-D Action: draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-03.txt



I just posted an Editorial update that only touches the non-normative script
to add a -q (quiet) flag.  Here's the diff:


Separately, it's been more than two weeks since the below message.   There
has been no comments on #2 below, and so the chairs can more forward with
the publishing request now?


Kent // author (recused chair)



On May 30, 2019, at 10:41 AM, Kent Watsen <
<> > wrote:



This update reflects the changes discussed during the Last Call plus the
following additional changes:


  1) s/see if any/ensure at least one/  (EDITORIAL: sounded too casual

  2) s/MUST NOT precede a space (' ') character/MUST NOT be on top of a
space (' ') character/  (TECHNICAL: see below)

  3) wrapped the script with <CODE BEGINS> and <CODE ENDS> (EDITORIAL, per


Regarding #2, this change was made after I examined the algorithm more
carefully.  It would be good for others to confirm this rather critical



Kent // contributor



On May 30, 2019, at 10:30 AM,
<>  wrote:


A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.

       Title           : Handling Long Lines in Inclusions in
Internet-Drafts and RFCs
       Authors         : Kent Watsen
                         Adrian Farrel
                         Qin Wu
   Filename        : draft-ietf-netmod-artwork-folding-03.txt
       Pages           : 25
       Date            : 2019-05-30

  This document defines two strategies for handling long lines in
  width-bounded text content.  One strategy is based on the historic
  use of a single backslash ('\') character to indicate where line-
  folding has occurred, with the continuation occurring with the first
  non-space (' ') character on the next line.  The second strategy
  extends the first strategy by adding a second backslash character to
  identify where the continuation begins and thereby able to handle
  cases not supported by the first strategy.  Both strategies use a
  self-describing header enabling automated reconstitution of the
  original content.

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There are also htmlized versions available at:

A diff from the previous version is available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:

netmod mailing list <>


netmod mailing list <>