Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06

Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> Mon, 07 December 2020 22:39 UTC

Return-Path: <010001763f5c7952-e9c5e4dc-5b61-4d4a-8d60-880de4288cd7-000000@amazonses.watsen.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326E3A0B50 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:39:57 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.897
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JRWezm6S9nyG for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:39:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB7B3A09D6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:39:55 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1607380794; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Feedback-ID; bh=3VPWESw0W0KgPMxFkBGQ7j5fy/N8H1B7YB5VZGS6YXY=; b=egWH/1JT1eCH0bE5JxceBoOp4+Jfck2+iVKSzQ/xSyhinS3aJ9W/QaFQPCrX8oN2 iKhb+j08zpK35necesLbqFNpamnLPxDwU/ckYMbAgu4VWsL76tdzuRNm7Ep28BaWQJu 2ODPyk2ZGCUoTKMTQ1T2u5PwVYQ+RjlLNf/LEE8o=
From: Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_559FA4C2-6F20-493A-BCDC-41EFAC8A8040"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\))
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 22:39:53 +0000
References: <24cf37e7-bd2e-8ffe-d062-cf7bfbce6d2d@labn.net> <01000175f7578c79-564788c9-19ef-49f7-a6a1-f2dd7dd2bb8c-000000@email.amazonses.com> <010001763f51be69-e02919f1-e431-4600-93d5-24e34a54b775-000000@email.amazonses.com>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <010001763f51be69-e02919f1-e431-4600-93d5-24e34a54b775-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Message-ID: <010001763f5c7952-e9c5e4dc-5b61-4d4a-8d60-880de4288cd7-000000@email.amazonses.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2)
X-SES-Outgoing: 2020.12.07-54.240.48.93
Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/xDeEm_V176czgUBTpf9D_L_CP3o>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 22:39:57 -0000

Correction.

Some authors replied:

	"No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”.

While others replied:

	"No, I'm not aware of any non-disclosed IPR that applies to this draft."

K.


> On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:
> 
> Thank you, authors.
> 
> All authors responded with "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft”.
> 
> Kent (as co-chair)
> 
> 
> 
>> On Nov 23, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net <mailto:kent+ietf@watsen.net>> wrote:
>> 
>> Authors,
>> 
>> Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption call on the "yang-node-tags” draft.  In preparation for that, we’ve determined both that the draft has changed significantly and that there is a new author, and therefore feel it necessary to issue another IPR call, as follows:
>> 
>> 
>> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>> 
>> As part of preparation for WG Adoption:
>> 
>> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>> 
>> Please state either:
>> 
>> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
>> or
>> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>> 
>> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
>> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>> 
>> If yes to the above, please state either:
>> 
>> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
>> or
>> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>> 
>> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
>> appropriate.
>> 
>> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors.  If you
>> contributed to the document please respond.  Alternatively, please feel
>> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and
>> would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to
>> acknowledgments after WG adoption).
>> 
>> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
>> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
>> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
>> stage until a response has been received from each author.
>> 
>> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES.
>> 
>> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
>> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
>> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
>> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
>> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
>> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
>> and
>> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty>.
>> 
>> Thank you,
>> NETMOD WG Chairs
>> 
>> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
>> response.
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> 
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod