From nobody Mon Dec 7 14:39:59 2020 Return-Path: <010001763f5c7952-e9c5e4dc-5b61-4d4a-8d60-880de4288cd7-000000@amazonses.watsen.net> X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326E3A0B50 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:39:57 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -1.897 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.897 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=amazonses.com Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JRWezm6S9nyG for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:39:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com (a48-93.smtp-out.amazonses.com [54.240.48.93]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CB7B3A09D6 for ; Mon, 7 Dec 2020 14:39:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=224i4yxa5dv7c2xz3womw6peuasteono; d=amazonses.com; t=1607380794; h=From:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:Date:References:To:In-Reply-To:Message-Id:Feedback-ID; bh=3VPWESw0W0KgPMxFkBGQ7j5fy/N8H1B7YB5VZGS6YXY=; b=egWH/1JT1eCH0bE5JxceBoOp4+Jfck2+iVKSzQ/xSyhinS3aJ9W/QaFQPCrX8oN2 iKhb+j08zpK35necesLbqFNpamnLPxDwU/ckYMbAgu4VWsL76tdzuRNm7Ep28BaWQJu 2ODPyk2ZGCUoTKMTQ1T2u5PwVYQ+RjlLNf/LEE8o= From: Kent Watsen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_559FA4C2-6F20-493A-BCDC-41EFAC8A8040" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2020 22:39:53 +0000 References: <24cf37e7-bd2e-8ffe-d062-cf7bfbce6d2d@labn.net> <01000175f7578c79-564788c9-19ef-49f7-a6a1-f2dd7dd2bb8c-000000@email.amazonses.com> <010001763f51be69-e02919f1-e431-4600-93d5-24e34a54b775-000000@email.amazonses.com> To: "netmod@ietf.org" In-Reply-To: <010001763f51be69-e02919f1-e431-4600-93d5-24e34a54b775-000000@email.amazonses.com> Message-ID: <010001763f5c7952-e9c5e4dc-5b61-4d4a-8d60-880de4288cd7-000000@email.amazonses.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-SES-Outgoing: 2020.12.07-54.240.48.93 Feedback-ID: 1.us-east-1.DKmIRZFhhsBhtmFMNikgwZUWVrODEw9qVcPhqJEI2DA=:AmazonSES Archived-At: Subject: Re: [netmod] Regarding IPR on draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-06 X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: NETMOD WG list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2020 22:39:57 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_559FA4C2-6F20-493A-BCDC-41EFAC8A8040 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Correction. Some authors replied: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft=E2=80=9D.= While others replied: "No, I'm not aware of any non-disclosed IPR that applies to this = draft." K. > On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Kent Watsen wrote: >=20 > Thank you, authors. >=20 > All authors responded with "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies = to this draft=E2=80=9D. >=20 > Kent (as co-chair) >=20 >=20 >=20 >> On Nov 23, 2020, at 6:01 PM, Kent Watsen > wrote: >>=20 >> Authors, >>=20 >> Per the 109 session, it is the chairs intent to do another adoption = call on the "yang-node-tags=E2=80=9D draft. In preparation for that, = we=E2=80=99ve determined both that the draft has changed significantly = and that there is a new author, and therefore feel it necessary to issue = another IPR call, as follows: >>=20 >>=20 >> Authors, Contributors, WG, >>=20 >> As part of preparation for WG Adoption: >>=20 >> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? >>=20 >> Please state either: >>=20 >> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" >> or >> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" >>=20 >> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules >> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? >>=20 >> If yes to the above, please state either: >>=20 >> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules" >> or >> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" >>=20 >> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think >> appropriate. >>=20 >> We note that all DT members are listed as contributors. If you >> contributed to the document please respond. Alternatively, please = feel >> free to state that you didn't materially contribute to the draft and >> would like your name removed from the contribution section (and moved = to >> acknowledgments after WG adoption). >>=20 >> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer = the >> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you = are >> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next >> stage until a response has been received from each author. >>=20 >> NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO LINES. >>=20 >> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not = listed >> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under >> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are >> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from >> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your >> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed = above >> and >> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty = . >>=20 >> Thank you, >> NETMOD WG Chairs >>=20 >> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your >> response. >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> netmod mailing list >> netmod@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod >=20 > _______________________________________________ > netmod mailing list > netmod@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod --Apple-Mail=_559FA4C2-6F20-493A-BCDC-41EFAC8A8040 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Correction.

Some authors replied:

= "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this = draft=E2=80=9D.

While others replied:

"No, I'm not aware of any = non-disclosed IPR that applies to this draft."

K.


On Dec 7, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Kent Watsen = <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:

Thank you, = authors.

All authors = responded with "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this = draft=E2=80=9D.

Kent (as = co-chair)



On Nov 23, 2020, at 6:01 PM, = Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net> wrote:

Authors,

Per the 109 session, it = is the chairs intent to do another adoption call on the = "yang-node-tags=E2=80=9D draft.  In preparation for that, we=E2=80=99= ve determined both that the draft has changed significantly and that = there is a new author, and therefore feel it necessary to issue another = IPR call, as follows:


Authors,= Contributors, WG,

As part of preparation = for WG Adoption:

Are you aware of any IPR = that applies to drafts identified above?

Please state either:

"No, I'm = not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
or
"Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"

If so, has this IPR been disclosed in = compliance with IETF IPR rules
(see RFCs 3669, 5378 and = 8179 for more details)?

If yes to the = above, please state either:

"Yes, the IPR = has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
or
"No, the IPR has not been disclosed"

If you answer no, please provide any additional details you = think
appropriate.

We note = that all DT members are listed as contributors.  If you
contributed to the document please respond. =  Alternatively, please feel
free to state that you = didn't materially contribute to the draft and
would like = your name removed from the contribution section (and moved to
acknowledgments after WG adoption).

If you are listed as a document author or contributor please = answer the
above by responding to this email regardless of = whether or not you are
aware of any relevant IPR. This = document will not advance to the next
stage until a = response has been received from each author.

NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S TO = LINES.

If you are on the WG email list or = attend WG meetings but are not listed
as an author or = contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
the = IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain = from
participating in any contribution or discussion = related to your
undisclosed IPR. For more information, = please see the RFCs listed above
and
http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualPro= perty.

Thank you,
NETMOD = WG Chairs

PS Please include all listed in = the headers of this message in your
response.

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

= --Apple-Mail=_559FA4C2-6F20-493A-BCDC-41EFAC8A8040--