IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)

Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie> Tue, 22 March 2016 16:11 UTC

Return-Path: <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0168712D89B; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:11:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.302
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.302 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cs.tcd.ie
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8MJSa46n9RGq; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:11:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [134.226.56.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03DAF12D6C5; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:10:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33567BE33; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:10:54 +0000 (GMT)
X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at scss.tcd.ie
Received: from mercury.scss.tcd.ie ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercury.scss.tcd.ie [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8QDOUwWtBoDp; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:10:48 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from [192.150.181.133] (unknown [192.150.181.133]) by mercury.scss.tcd.ie (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2BF28BE35; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:10:48 +0000 (GMT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.tcd.ie; s=mail; t=1458663048; bh=rlahitxsf+qzh0W2ViqI9D2TmOdMj8qAW5SW3RjAqKk=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=jmgwJUT5BdFmyGDnkYwnps8LI9dJ4pFbDrso9WFCQlwTiTV/sLwo0xkJ1VAHUyjdm tQ2KceymJLSMmwWRT8dOdZgppS/J1//a9FY8QVjCwq8Wx7KZT5HRSSZT/Vpdc5/kGJ qGTz5O3fK1LWJ+pnxD+8O2aLcNAmYEo/RUU14ADw=
To: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>, Ladislav Lhotka <lhotka@nic.cz>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
References: <20160317113347.3650.38937.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <m2d1qnj2ec.fsf@birdie.labs.nic.cz> <56F15CAD.2010406@cisco.com>
From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
Openpgp: id=D66EA7906F0B897FB2E97D582F3C8736805F8DA2; url=
Message-ID: <56F16E87.7070902@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:10:47 +0000
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <56F15CAD.2010406@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha-256"; boundary="------------ms070909070705030301070402"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/xQAbZPxJKYhgahXMgFEtAH6-b5s>
Cc: netmod-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [netmod] Stephen Farrell's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-yang-json-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 16:11:28 -0000


On 22/03/16 14:54, Benoit Claise wrote:
> I re-reviewed the security directory review, and from my vantage point,
> I believe that Lada addressed the review.

In case it helps, I've no problems with that.
S

> 
> Regards, Benoit

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email