Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Editorial comments on draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-05
Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Thu, 28 June 2018 00:29 UTC
Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E533C130E58; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:29:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Lcq8B2BdmcGk; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBC8C130E3C; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108161.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w5S0T454024210; Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:29:04 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=a2tgHpIuCHf7oAOTxNMswDs87cNptfZKAxeEIeJ8tVY=; b=tBeqL/Xfr26TCyJmiwWJdjO0T75KBfqO5zQ9omjR+Vkp0hmoN/AUokY+16AgYnuykLjT nU58gM3Ni5PGTJRK7XFMWlM+q2TPAGBndxGXZnocHs0WN0kEKIP+BBGWuAwPpU7Ze4QJ aVW4BzzFRAm+x9dvQxdq8ShZ7IQ2EH8/bl2XuWo6dPEGsvqmtlK39Pj41lwWCqYpoOds eO0BK5NOKEzzmSqsmcFts0CzO0Y8Wv6tXZlE6RuvFoA36ywp2C9qr2n0GzNm1PlvKTv2 bQBilkjNZ4PByMJzvewRbXtMY4m0+qMpw/HyooVXsoDilwCbhKTl/Tfo77fM6Zh+YHaE 3Q==
Received: from nam04-sn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-sn1nam04lp0088.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.180.88]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2jvjg50891-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 27 Jun 2018 17:29:04 -0700
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.200.153) by BYAPR05MB4150.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (52.135.199.159) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.906.15; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:29:02 +0000
Received: from BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc]) by BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::959d:9fbe:90e4:3cc%4]) with mapi id 15.20.0906.018; Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:29:02 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>, Jonathan Hansford <jonathan@hansfords.net>, "netconf@ietf.org" <netconf@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] [Netconf] Editorial comments on draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-05
Thread-Index: AQHUDncDs4nRJksvJUuYWYAJ1pEQJQ==
Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:29:02 +0000
Message-ID: <4A628020-7EBD-4EA1-B254-6E8FA3323914@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.10]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BYAPR05MB4150; 7:iUfdmitNbMIOa3szOqn32GKoYvIZIZk583BGFWsemXyTsLlH/16hFR9cgqqnxQKCob6v7VDBUojbMKuKiADtGlvQEQzKaao7+ux9olNjx4eJrAufT0GvFfmwiKGmIoqd7gbrV/zBJjf8PK42Drbp9XX69jk26DpQgsmlBufjtp7HFo+JDsjC55p0coGY+g+wObitn95pO3Wh46pSSU56eM/6TIh/HmZVZIIF5rN4SWqZ051KSzKlhyfC6I43fgM3
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 35be7ac8-dae8-425c-d8b4-08d5dc8e25f7
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652034)(8989117)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(8990107)(5600026)(711020)(48565401081)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4150;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: BYAPR05MB4150:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BYAPR05MB4150B66C7CEFFB1F58486D3EA54F0@BYAPR05MB4150.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(8211001083)(6040522)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3231254)(944501410)(52105095)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(149027)(150027)(6041310)(20161123564045)(20161123560045)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(6072148)(201708071742011)(7699016); SRVR:BYAPR05MB4150; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4150;
x-forefront-prvs: 0717E25089
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(39860400002)(396003)(366004)(346002)(136003)(376002)(189003)(199004)(36756003)(83716003)(8936002)(86362001)(53936002)(2201001)(6512007)(81166006)(8676002)(81156014)(68736007)(2906002)(2501003)(478600001)(5250100002)(58126008)(6436002)(7736002)(305945005)(66066001)(316002)(229853002)(6246003)(6486002)(105586002)(186003)(106356001)(102836004)(97736004)(5660300001)(14454004)(6116002)(2616005)(3846002)(486006)(99286004)(476003)(25786009)(82746002)(110136005)(2900100001)(26005)(33656002)(6346003)(256004)(14444005)(6506007); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BYAPR05MB4150; H:BYAPR05MB4230.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: EdrtZ+rgOQvjyG9a+5iB7eB8cuMPDPHLH3EhY9L1P2v9/PNeNGFAhUEwrrb8XodajS8Js9C/IQpHNb2vSuLB27rgVzcfBSl6qqV/uC0K4u6tducDxVJeOcYys/ZaBGYiNVolPR/EW9d5FMhsY4PEx9lvOpDAjnFuHVY3JabcAHrWyxyEJTD3FRLJoYo2qViQ4XMlMe7kegFiZg/tobeEDosEVbek4jwmJQcKPd//hW9ejcDi5LfkoD04eXp8aKkzrzsDpcoYlsHXmDQy/prxM30N4Bm64iwhIQABerP5QoP1QLSv9YW+bFXw/6sO2CXQiE54d+/WfGfz1BFw/stvnxXgvMjVNLtowwWAdB/erm0=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <5BBC0FD6D0347B4F93BC3328EECC4919@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 35be7ac8-dae8-425c-d8b4-08d5dc8e25f7
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 28 Jun 2018 00:29:02.2028 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BYAPR05MB4150
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-06-27_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1806280004
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/xsp_rFOQP4B_OIihlTSWgbfk-ZE>
Subject: Re: [netmod] [Netconf] Editorial comments on draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-05
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2018 00:29:15 -0000
Hi Jonathan, I have applied all your suggestions for -06 - thanks! Regarding this exchange: >> Section 5.3, 4th paragraph: Arguably this should be from bottom-to-top >> as, going from top-to-bottom, once you have concatenated two lines the >> '\' will not be on the folding-column From a draft-text perspective, you may be on to something. From a code perspective, I tried bottom-to-top before and didn't get very far, perhaps due to the limitations of `sed`. > [Qin]:In our code, we will delete unneeded ‘\’ line by line from top to > bottom. It think whether from bottom to top or from top to bottom, it > doesn’t matter since it is implementation specific. This is probably true (though I'm not 100% sure) but, so long as the draft has an "Unfolding" section, we need to ensure the text is valid. Kent // contributor