[netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC8407 (5693)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Tue, 30 April 2019 13:18 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FF1B120075; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:18:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BzmOIZq1ewBH; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17AD0120006; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:18:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id EBB7FB80069; Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:18:26 -0700 (PDT)
To: mobashshera.rasool@huawei.com, andy@yumaworks.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: ibagdona@gmail.com, iesg@ietf.org, netmod@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20190430131826.EBB7FB80069@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 06:18:26 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/yV9EKsJ8shTesqWlylYAzhtQuJQ>
Subject: [netmod] [Errata Verified] RFC8407 (5693)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2019 13:18:39 -0000

The following errata report has been verified for RFC8407,
"Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models". 

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5693

--------------------------------------
Status: Verified
Type: Editorial

Reported by: Mobashshera Rasool <mobashshera.rasool@huawei.com>
Date Reported: 2019-04-15
Verified by: Ignas Bagdonas (IESG)

Section: 4.17

Original Text
-------------
Note that the set of features within a module
   is easily discovered by the reader, but the set of related modules
   within the entire YANG library is not as easy to identity.  Module
   names with a common prefix can help readers identity the set of
   related modules, but this assumes the reader will have discovered and
   installed all the relevant modules.

Corrected Text
--------------
Note that the set of features within a module
   is easily discovered by the reader, but the set of related modules
   within the entire YANG library is not as easy to identify.  Module
   names with a common prefix can help readers identify the set of
   related modules, but this assumes the reader will have discovered and
   installed all the relevant modules.

Notes
-----
The word identity is not correct here. It should be identify to give the sentence correct meaning.

--------------------------------------
RFC8407 (draft-ietf-netmod-rfc6087bis-20)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Guidelines for Authors and Reviewers of Documents Containing YANG Data Models
Publication Date    : October 2018
Author(s)           : A. Bierman
Category            : BEST CURRENT PRACTICE
Source              : Network Modeling
Area                : Operations and Management
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG