Re: [netmod] New Version Notification for draft-kwatsen-netmod-artwork-folding-07.txt

[Kent Watsen <[e-mail]>]

>> Now, to take it forward, I would like to constrain our efforts to
>> solving the problem at hand. If our solution has wider applicability,
>> that's great. But can we recognise that the overwhelming bulk of case
>> we see today are in YANG documents and that's up to us to solve.
>
>That sounds like a good way forward; it calls for a number of changes,
> tightening the applicability in sections 1, 2, 3 and 4 IMO.

I'm unsure what the problem at hand is, but there is nothing NETMOD
specific about this, and we (the IETF) wouldn't want each WG rolling
their own solution.  Also, note Martin's strong objection to seeing
this being used for tree-diagrams and yang modules, so even less 
NETMOD specific...

Adrian previously wrote "So it seemed that there would be value in 
defining how that artwork could be automatically wrapped allowing the
authors to not worry about line wrapping."  I agree, the ultimate
goal would be to integrate this with `xml2rfc`, but it should be free
to do so without regard for what kind of artwork it is, or from which
WG it came from.

Where in our rather liberal NETMOD charter sanctions this work?

Kent // pick a hat