Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions

Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com> Tue, 05 September 2017 07:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9000713240D; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:12:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id s1UMp9jAmTrN; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:12:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-1.cisco.com (aer-iport-1.cisco.com [173.38.203.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D6E1120727; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 00:12:32 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1071; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1504595552; x=1505805152; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=3/115RJ332EwH0zdJ1c1FLEM/tXEX7BFa8zuKwIri2g=; b=UMddJcpdfDi+RFb3NgkGMmLdQt35LIXeGMOEIZTxMCrI+OalR/u8Ip13 FU2zxALLLcVB3m6/zjVBO9P81V5TvHJKcAUCG2RZTNdMvtHdIKZ7GY0ls lK76I6xtcAYwqq5Ff9LtmhxiFmJL8Ssh2PryNFkJaCsxOLS6hWKmJJUmv s=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A0DcAACwTa5Z/xbLJq1dGQEBAQEBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBBwEBAQEBhD6BFYN3iiB0p0aCEgoYDYRKTwKEXxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAgE?= =?us-ascii?q?DAQEhDwEFNhsLDgwCJgICJzAGAQwGAgEBii0QsHGCJ4tTAQEBAQEBAQECAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEbBYENgh2DUIFjK4J9iAiCYQEEoHSHW4x2ghOFZ4Nahx2JfINbhykDBgU?= =?us-ascii?q?CGYE5HziBDTIhCBwVSYcdPjaLHQEBAQ?=
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,479,1498521600"; d="scan'208";a="696974395"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-2.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Sep 2017 07:12:30 +0000
Received: from [10.55.221.36] (ams-bclaise-nitro3.cisco.com [10.55.221.36]) by aer-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v857CUXJ014981; Tue, 5 Sep 2017 07:12:30 GMT
To: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, "netconf-chairs@ietf.org" <netconf-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <14299503-509D-43BE-A938-0B7B88C3B249@juniper.net>
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <3620aafe-bc72-cc54-9dbd-b687a0178df2@cisco.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2017 09:12:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <14299503-509D-43BE-A938-0B7B88C3B249@juniper.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/ycD73YF4dAUfKDGe-7xqDpt4f8g>
Subject: Re: [netmod] upcoming adoptions
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2017 07:12:34 -0000

Kent,
> Hey folks,
>
> As discussed at the last meeting, we are heading to revising existing RFCs to align them with NMDA.  The first batch have been published as individual drafts:
>
> 1. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7223bis-00
> 2. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bjorklund-netmod-rfc7277bis-00
> 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-acee-netmod-rfc8022bis-00
Good. And there is one more in for NETMOD, as discussed in 
https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/99/materials/slides-99-netmod-sessa-nmda-qa: 
RFC 7317
In NETCONF, we have also:
     RFC 6022, no I-D submitted yet
     RFC 7895, already adopted
     RFC 8040, no I-D submitted yet. No immediate plan to update?
>
> Please take a look (comments welcome!) and stay tuned for the related adoption calls.
Yes, we know that we have to update those RFCs.

Regards, Benoit
>
> Thanks,
> Kent (and Lou)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> .
>