Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01

Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com> Mon, 18 December 2017 11:24 UTC

Return-Path: <vladimir@transpacket.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7130B126CBF; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 03:24:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I_4XDxZc9ZyE; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 03:24:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com (s91205186171.blix.com [91.205.186.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB643124B09; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 03:24:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F52A1560606; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:24:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.transpacket.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id HQhlO5LZMH8n; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:24:10 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D0D1560605; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:24:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail.transpacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.transpacket.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id cjatlc_Ky4gU; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:24:09 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [192.168.209.122] (s1853520235.blix.com [185.35.202.35]) by mail.transpacket.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F63E15605FD; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:24:09 +0100 (CET)
To: "Acee Lindem (acee)" <acee@cisco.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, NetMod WG <netmod@ietf.org>
Cc: NetMod WG Chairs <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <8568e55c-29c6-272e-dd9f-7d1b150edba6@labn.net> <44e5318a-4157-b825-b688-5185ab2458cb@labn.net> <D65C0ACB.E2B1E%acee@cisco.com>
From: Vladimir Vassilev <vladimir@transpacket.com>
Message-ID: <43f78a5f-9485-05cc-dd11-2ff29ced6120@transpacket.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 12:24:09 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <D65C0ACB.E2B1E%acee@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: nb
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/yhpU96Hz-UG2qHbs3dSKdF0_3wY>
Subject: Re: [netmod] WG Last Call: draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 11:24:14 -0000


On 12/17/2017 05:57 PM, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> Hi Lou, et al,
>
> The only issue we are struggling with is whether we need to specify the
> version in the ietf-interfaces import. We have noted that
> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc7277bis-01.txt does not import by revision.
>
> We also have so nits:
>
>     1. Add an informative reference for
> [I-D.ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams].
>     2. Based on a comment from Vladimir, we added the prefix for
> ietf-routing.yang, “rt:”, to several references within ietf-routing.yang.
> Was this necessary? Of course, the model compiles with or without the
> prefix.
I reverted this in a follow-up comment on the same thread. I believe the 
local prefixes are redundant.

Vladimir
>
> Thanks,
> Acee
>
> On 12/15/17, 3:55 PM, "netmod on behalf of Lou Berger"
> <netmod-bounces@ietf.org on behalf of lberger@labn.net>; wrote:
>
>> All,
>> 	This last call is closed.
>>
>> We note that there was an update during the LC and that no comments were
>> received during the LC period.  As this is simply a mechanical update
>> that has been discussed in the WG we plan to proceed with the
>> publication process.
>>
>> Authors,
>> 	Please let/us the WG know when you have published a version ready for
>> publication.  Also please let the WG know what has changed in the
>> document since the start of LC (rev -01)
>>
>> Thank you,
>> NetMod Chairs
>>
>>
>>
>> On 11/29/2017 12:26 PM, Lou Berger wrote:
>>> All,
>>>
>>> This starts a two-week working group last call on
>>> draft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.
>>>
>>> Please recall that this update's intention is to
>>> modify the YANG module to be in line with the NMDA
>>> guidelines [1].  Reviewing the diff between the two
>>> drafts [2] should reveal just this.
>>>
>>> The working group last call ends on December 13.
>>> Please send your comments to the netmod mailing list.
>>>
>>> Positive comments, e.g., "I've reviewed this document
>>> and believe it is ready for publication", are welcome!
>>> This is useful and important, even from authors.
>>>
>>> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-dsdt-nmda-guidelines-01
>>> [2]
>>> https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?difftype=--hwdiff&url1=rfc8022.txt&url2=dr
>>> aft-ietf-netmod-rfc8022bis-01.txt
>>>
>>> Thank you,
>>> Netmod Chairs
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> netmod mailing list
>> netmod@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod