Re: [netmod] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14: (with COMMENT)

Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com> Mon, 13 April 2020 03:12 UTC

Return-Path: <bill.wu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEE23A0BB5; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:12:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qfT82M-YEBt8; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:12:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBE9A3A0BB3; Sun, 12 Apr 2020 20:12:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from lhreml711-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id A2F517F8628C69A22D35; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 04:12:04 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.62) by lhreml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1913.5; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 04:12:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML424-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.1.199.41) by lhreml711-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.62) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1913.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 04:12:04 +0100
Received: from DGGEML531-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.5.134]) by dggeml424-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.1.199.41]) with mapi id 14.03.0487.000; Mon, 13 Apr 2020 11:11:59 +0800
From: Qin Wu <bill.wu@huawei.com>
To: Murray Kucherawy <superuser@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default@ietf.org>, "netmod-chairs@ietf.org" <netmod-chairs@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>, Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
Thread-Topic: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AdYRPe2uJVNrt5z8ShuZnpb1m+9OAA==
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:11:58 +0000
Message-ID: <B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAAD5E750D@dggeml531-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.138.33.123]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/zFsdjtejnTveArTxJ7jZ_ZYitnU>
Subject: Re: [netmod] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 03:12:09 -0000

Thanks Murray, see reply inline below.
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Murray Kucherawy via Datatracker [mailto:noreply@ietf.org] 
发送时间: 2020年4月4日 4:12
收件人: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
抄送: draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default@ietf.org; netmod-chairs@ietf.org; netmod@ietf.org; Kent Watsen <kent+ietf@watsen.net>
主题: Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14: (with COMMENT)

Murray Kucherawy has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-factory-default/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 2:
* "All security sensitive data (i.e., private keys, passwords, etc.)  SHOULD be overwritten ..." presents a choice.  Why would an implementer not do this? * 
[Qin]: This was outcome of the discussion, see the following link:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/qrU_71AkP42lnkR6KnfaMsoSgCs/
i.e., folks concerned to restore security data and password to default value, that's we introduce clean requirements to address this concern.
"Implementors SHOULD reboot the device or otherwise restart processes needed to bootstrap it." leads me to the same question.
[Qin]: To make default configuration take effect, the device reboot is recommended, but in some case, the IP address reachability of the device may be lost, therefore bootstrapping may be needed.
Nits:
* "Upon receiving the RPC" is followed by a list, so please add a colon
* "datastores(e.g.," -- add a space after "datastores"

[Qin]: Fixed, thanks.
Section 3:
Nits:
* "The contents of <factory-default> is defined  ..." -- s/is/are/

[Qin]: Fixed, thanks.
Section 5:
* "This document registers one URI in the IETF XML Registry [RFC3688]. ..."
should say explicitly that it's the "ns" sub-registry receiving a new entry.

[Qin]:Okay.