Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request

Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com> Fri, 22 December 2017 14:23 UTC

Return-Path: <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D57F12EAB3; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:23:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1B9JPPZc719I; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:23:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E026F12EAB2; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:23:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E1C7156270B9; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:23:42 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com (10.208.112.40) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.42) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:23:44 +0000
Received: from SJCEML521-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.1.83]) by SJCEML701-CHM.china.huawei.com ([169.254.3.207]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 06:23:41 -0800
From: Igor Bryskin <Igor.Bryskin@huawei.com>
To: "lberger@labn.net" <lberger@labn.net>, "joelja@bogus.com" <joelja@bogus.com>, "draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org>, "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request
Thread-Index: AQHTePjMSYSuQYfNYUGK68E5pr/EAKNO05qAgACbYls=
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:23:40 +0000
Message-ID: <etPan.5a3d1590.2bde0b8e.fa1@localhost>
References: <780f5479-6f7b-21b8-e9c7-741ae0063c3f@bogus.com>, <255ae0d8-6ba4-9bb1-49e3-c23dc42171bc@labn.net>
In-Reply-To: <255ae0d8-6ba4-9bb1-49e3-c23dc42171bc@labn.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_etPan5a3d15902bde0b8efa1localhost_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/zSsUiWHwm_MBpEz7tY0UqyjTNQc>
Subject: Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 14:23:50 -0000

Hi,
I have a question for the authors.
Today a yang-tree-diagram represents extended  YANG groupings , which often makes a tree hard to read/ understand. Do you think there could be a way to represent groupings as collapsed?

Thanks,
Igor
From:Lou Berger
To:joel jaeggli,draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams@ietf.org,netmod@ietf.org,
Date:2017-12-21 16:07:58
Subject:Re: [netmod] draft-ietf-netmod-yang-tree-diagrams - IPR verfication request

No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft

Lou
(co-author)

On 12/19/2017 1:39 PM, joel jaeggli wrote:
> Authors, Contributors, WG,
>
> As part of the preparation for WG Last Call:
>
> Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above?
>
> Please state either:
>
> "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft"
> or
> "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft"
>
> If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules
> (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)?
>
> If yes to the above, please state either:
>
> "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules"
> or
> "No, the IPR has not been disclosed"
>
> If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think
> appropriate.
>
> If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the
> above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are
> aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next
> stage until a response has been received from each author and listed
> contributor. NOTE: THIS APPLIES TO ALL OF YOU LISTED IN THIS MESSAGE'S
> TO LINES.
>
> If you are on the WG email list or attend WG meetings but are not listed
> as an author or contributor, we remind you of your obligations under
> the IETF IPR rules which encourages you to notify the IETF if you are
> aware of IPR of others on an IETF contribution, or to refrain from
> participating in any contribution or discussion related to your
> undisclosed IPR. For more information, please see the RFCs listed above
> and
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/group/iesg/trac/wiki/IntellectualProperty.
>
> Thank you,
> NetMod WG Chairs
>
> PS Please include all listed in the headers of this message in your
> response.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> netmod mailing list
> netmod@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

_______________________________________________
netmod mailing list
netmod@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod