[netmod] schema-mount pre09 branch

Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net> Wed, 31 January 2018 21:36 UTC

Return-Path: <kwatsen@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netmod@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 062CD12D838 for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:36:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=juniper.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o55D_qhZQB5c for <netmod@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:36:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com [67.231.152.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E440E126CD6 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:36:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0108161.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w0VLXlM1002743 for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:36:10 -0800
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=juniper.net; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=PPS1017; bh=CFL9wqAcCmiJmVKcvs4EhjxqUV+ObE7jhnYLyycUQ+4=; b=mopFO1U/QjSKzFfAyOq0hjzAClImySxhq+k5zwO0Lo8/lKdPLnEPVkbiXn/2Fe/j4Rk3 w+l8XWsYE7oeA3UbXiQd+Aifzd99jl4grKzd83HipodUo/nCsmRQ4i1QrpZRINKNyLPi C5LrA0qQgEvv3S0kcNzhH22iXp/md6nCQgjwM2yxmFAqc/HDqPOPHzjbE1m9cu8bEhTk GgCfF707YJoyCNL/8xBjCMGOnwylCFPTODKMDPrliftfl/qt5Jp8fzp79aJpDKjwY7Hh S8gss62vVg+bspB3j1znk/s+jBK2bXJezWVs3gf6Rdb6n0jrsNHDa893w20FAbqpsTwr Yw==
Received: from nam03-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-by2nam03lp0052.outbound.protection.outlook.com [216.32.180.52]) by mx0b-00273201.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2funcur2vu-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <netmod@ietf.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 13:36:10 -0800
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.174.240.147) by DM5PR05MB3114.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.173.219.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P256) id 15.20.485.3; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:36:07 +0000
Received: from DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.240.147]) by DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.174.240.147]) with mapi id 15.20.0464.012; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:36:07 +0000
From: Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>
To: "netmod@ietf.org" <netmod@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: schema-mount pre09 branch
Thread-Index: AQHTmtuBvJr0HeYRT0idzYLw7Rs9mA==
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:36:07 +0000
Message-ID: <53639272-C297-4757-A225-E1DAE123CBFB@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM5PR05MB3114; 7:yTdcyU0QNNX+e9I+isGKoxfk7uc52zRf33Uig6zyRqjTNMHlRIgl1asc30xvqMxCd4UtLXBHI2sBwJwAin82T6Ske5vI3WvfOtbmNTTrHNNpMa94T1DaLgtiT0lEbZfnOvAmM5Ho+8t0Na0I2QAfTCuvszQ7VSd95jPidaAPSq0ov6UR5By4vyYPnvs4Jywl5mJLWZD+ilfqAGA/8uYdZ1al3BR4fVJmFm+9NroOnprJ/0k/rrOV9ncrz9aQ9ko6
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SSOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-ht: Tenant
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3864ccea-d1ea-4c7a-fc0e-08d568f2a3a4
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(48565401081)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(2017052603307)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3114;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: DM5PR05MB3114:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM5PR05MB3114446C8A76F772A8E94B6FA5FB0@DM5PR05MB3114.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(275740015457677);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040501)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3231101)(2400082)(944501161)(3002001)(93006095)(93001095)(6055026)(6041288)(201703131423095)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123562045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(20161123560045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:DM5PR05MB3114; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3114;
x-forefront-prvs: 056929CBB8
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(396003)(39860400002)(39380400002)(366004)(346002)(376002)(199004)(189003)(966005)(8676002)(81166006)(1730700003)(81156014)(53936002)(102836004)(33656002)(2501003)(106356001)(36756003)(26005)(6486002)(6306002)(83506002)(6512007)(99286004)(105586002)(82746002)(6116002)(3846002)(2351001)(316002)(2900100001)(66066001)(14454004)(58126008)(25786009)(305945005)(97736004)(186003)(5640700003)(83716003)(6916009)(7736002)(478600001)(6506007)(6436002)(3280700002)(3660700001)(77096007)(2906002)(59450400001)(68736007)(86362001)(5660300001)(8936002); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM5PR05MB3114; H:DM5PR05MB3484.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: juniper.net does not designate permitted sender hosts)
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 4lK5zDsxQJs0xn8c/WuMuVivK35Zr43iwjmSq6WH/IN6x9ZD9gYAV8ilNLRL8aN16DwE743SHltMMRRvXdCIUQ==
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <DEEBCFD550CC1A4BB8D221039AC303A1@namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3864ccea-d1ea-4c7a-fc0e-08d568f2a3a4
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 31 Jan 2018 21:36:07.9353 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM5PR05MB3114
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-01-31_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_spam_notspam policy=outbound_spam score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1801310269
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/zqJTSIghKfsPTxyOEhMhDfK6Wds>
Subject: [netmod] schema-mount pre09 branch
X-BeenThere: netmod@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NETMOD WG list <netmod.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netmod/>
List-Post: <mailto:netmod@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod>, <mailto:netmod-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 21:36:13 -0000

All,

The authors created a "pre09" branch on GitHub a few weeks back.  On this branch, they completed a full update of the draft.  While waiting for details on how to proceed with regards to a SM-bis, we thought it would be helpful to make this text available now so that the technical parts can be discussed.  With this in mind, can folks please have a quick look and post any technical comments they have?  


The "txt" version of the draft:  https://raw.githubusercontent.com/netmod-wg/schema-mount/pre09/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-pre-09.txt


rfcdiff against the current -08 draft:  https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-08&url2=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/netmod-wg/schema-mount/pre09/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-pre-09.txt


Since rfc7895bis obsoletes RFC 7895, the server-must-implement-rfc7895bis requirement is no surprise, right?

Thanks,
Kent // shepherd