[netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com> Thu, 11 October 2018 03:24 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Suresh Krishnan <suresh@kaloom.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount@ietf.org, Joel Jaeggli <joelja@gmail.com>, Lou Berger <lberger@labn.net>, Kent Watsen <kwatsen@juniper.net>, netmod-chairs@ietf.org, joelja@gmail.com, netmod@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <153922828107.5944.1683916629739613438.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 20:24:41 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/zz5UdOyJEeRQnQ_vwnicpptzRrI>
Subject: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: (with COMMENT)

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount-11: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-netmod-schema-mount/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 3.3.

I think it would be nice to have some examples to illustrate the differences
between inline and shared-schema and some guidance to pick between the two.

[netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on draft-… Suresh Krishnan
Re: [netmod] Suresh Krishnan's No Objection on dr… Martin Bjorklund