Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for discussion

Shunsuke Homma <homma.shunsuke@lab.ntt.co.jp> Tue, 30 January 2018 10:51 UTC

Return-Path: <homma.shunsuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1986212E03E for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:51:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.61
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.61 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QH6YEsVUDydc for <netslices@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:51:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp (tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.39.148]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B34131B37 for <netslices@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 02:45:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.86.154]) by tama500.ecl.ntt.co.jp (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id w0UAjPJx002950 for <netslices@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:45:25 +0900
Received: from vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CC260283 for <netslices@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:45:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp [129.60.87.134]) by vc2.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC48D5F593 for <netslices@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:45:25 +0900 (JST)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (unknown [129.60.13.28]) by jcms-pop21.ecl.ntt.co.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B89F24005E7 for <netslices@ietf.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:45:25 +0900 (JST)
References: <CAHYjOTbKq5SGx2dUt5citBq=21dRYS4nK_Sebdq0nyPX9T7bLg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Shunsuke Homma <homma.shunsuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Message-ID: <6e8bee29-9458-92a1-f2b5-507d9da642a2@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 19:44:47 +0900
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.5.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAHYjOTbKq5SGx2dUt5citBq=21dRYS4nK_Sebdq0nyPX9T7bLg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: netslices@ietf.org
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/1DuxEQKYGeqk7QI28M7Jr_1MvRc>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] Preliminary charter text for discussion
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2018 10:51:18 -0000

Hi Xavier, authors,

Thanks a lot for your greatly effort. IMO, as I mentioned in the 
notifying mail of slice gateway draft, defining requirements and 
fanctionalities of data plane are also important to clarifying whole 
architecture of network slicing, and thus I think the current charter 
text is in good shape.

Also, I have a small question about milestones. As far as I know, 
recently, several SDOs (e.g., 3GPP, TMF and ZSM) are studying network 
slicing framework. Do you have any plans or assumptions to cooperate 
with them? Also, are these milestones established depending on schedule 
of other SDOs?

Regards,

Shunsuke



On 2018/01/28 2:51, Xavier de Foy wrote:
> Hi all, a group of COMS proponents prepared a preliminary charter text, 
> taking into account recommendations collected when discussing the BoF 
> request for IETF 100 
> <https://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/BofIETF100#OperationsandManagement>.
> 
> The recommendations were for:
> 1. better account of the 4 key elements used in COMS: connectivity, 
> compute, storage resources + network & service functions;
> 2. better description of the functional blocks and their positions in COMS;
> 3. better FCAPS coverage;
> 4. better coverage of the management of the data plane.
> 
> Please share your comments on this list by Feb 1st. Other COMS 
> proponents are also invited to provide additional information to help 
> with the discussion.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Xavier, on behalf of COMS proponents.
> 
> 
> I. Context
> 
> The Common Operations and Management on Network Slices (COMS) WG 
> standardizes slice-level operations and management of the resources 
> associated with a network slice. These resources include both network 
> infrastructures and service functions. More specifically, network 
> infrastructures are normally comprised of physical/logical connections 
> in access, aggregation and backbone networks as well as computing and 
> storage elements. Meantime, service functions include network functions 
> and network function chains which are pre-defined using corresponding 
> network infrastructure elements. Such resources may be parts of 
> different domains enabled by different technologies.
> 
> A "Network Slice" is realized using a collection of technologies 
> spanning across data, control and management planes. Many of them rely 
> on existing IETF technologies including both concluded and in-progress 
> works such as:
> - Data plane: DetNet, TE-Tunnels, MPLS, Segment Routing VPNs, NVO3 etc.
> - Controller and/or control plane: ACTN, PCE and RSVP-TE (requiring LDP, 
> BGP, OSPF awareness at level below) etc.
> - Management plane: YANG, OAM etc.
> 
> The foundation of COMS is a technology-independent and resource-centric 
> management plane. In reality, the network slice provider may have 
> diverse technology choices in different domains due to geographical and 
> commercial reasons. Therefore, COMS makes no assumption on which 
> technology is used for specific domains. The goal of COMS is to define a 
> common and inter-operative management mechanism, which is essential for 
> the concept of network slicing being adopted in a system with 
> heterogeneous network infrastructures and services functions. Major 
> characteristics include:
> - Enabling composition of slices within a single or over multiple domains.
> - Allowing the operation and management of a network slice in a uniform 
> manner, even when this network slice span multiple technology and/or 
> administrative domains.
> - Enabling deployment of services over individual slices.
> 
> II. Scope
> 
> The WG will describe an overall architecture for network slicing. To 
> manage network slices in a technology-independent manner, the network 
> slice provider (NSP) will need to communicate with a network slice 
> orchestrator (NSO) over a COMS Service Delivery Interface (SDI). The 
> COMS SDI can also be used between network slice orchestrators, enabling 
> hierarchical management through the notion of network slice subnets. 
> Network slices will be leased to tenants, which will be able to use 
> Customer Service Interface (CSI) exposed by the NS provider to run 
> management tasks (e.g., on-demand measurement) within their slice 
> instance under certain policies.
> 
> The WG will describe an information model representing a network slice, 
> accounting for the key elements used in network slices: connectivity, 
> compute, storage resources, network and service functions — this 
> information model includes the representation of managed objects and 
> corresponding management and operations, will guide the design of data 
> models on SDI and CSI and also will enable orchestrators interworking.
> 
> The WG will specify requirements, operations and management 
> functionalities on network slicing interfaces SDI and/or CSI including:
> 1 Network slice service profile, e.g. set by NSP over SDI, including 
> high-level parameters for network infrastructures and service functions, 
> together with their corresponding performance requirements.
> 2 Lifecycle management of network slice.
> 3 Other FCAPS functions. An important task of NSP is to aggregate 
> faults, performance, status information and performance guarantees for 
> certain services.
> 4 Slice composition or stitching in multi-domain environment.
> 5 Slice management by the tenant under the control of NSP, including 
> deploying network services over a slice.
> 
> The WG will specify requirements and functionalities of data plane 
> entities as needed to enable the management of network slices. For 
> example, this may include abstractions of policy control and 
> enforcement, or gateway functionalities. The WG will also study the 
> mapping between the abstract information model and managed entities, and 
> will liaise with other IETF WGs as needed. However, the WG will not 
> attempt to replicate data plane technologies including DetNet, 
> TE-Tunnels, MPLS, Segment Routing VPNs, NVO3 etc.
> 
> III. Deliverables
> 
> WG deliverables are listed below and may be split in any number of 
> documents as determined by the WG:
> - Problem statement and use cases for management of network slices.
> - Architecture of network slices.
> - Information model(s) and operations for network slices on topics 
> described above in the scope section.
> - SDI and CSI interface specifications and relevant YANG models.
> - Study the mappings of technology independent network equipment 
> configurations derived from the information model towards specific 
> technologies and coordination with relevant WGs as needed.
> 
> IV. Milestones
> 
> Dec 2018     Problem Statement, use cases and architecture
> Dec 2018     Common information model and related YANG model
> June 2019    Network slices composition and interworking
> October 2019 FCAPS management functions and operations on network
>               slices including abstractions of policy control and
>               enforcement, or gateway functionalities.
> March 2020   SDI and CSI interface specifications and relevant YANG models
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Netslices mailing list
> Netslices@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices
> 


-- 
----------------------------------
Shunsuke Homma
<homma.shunsuke@lab.ntt.co.jp>
TEL: +81 422 59 3486
FAX: +81 422 60 7460

NTT Network Service Systems Labs.
Musashino city, Tokyo, Japan
----------------------------------