IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Netslices] COMS: What next?

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 06 May 2018 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DFE12D868; Sun, 6 May 2018 15:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v967AqgK6iAo; Sun, 6 May 2018 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta6.iomartmail.com (mta6.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219EA12426E; Sun, 6 May 2018 15:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta6.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w46MVsT4027453; Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:54 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EE022044; Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 439C922042; Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (73.44.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.44.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w46MVqLk018259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:53 +0100
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: 'Alexander Vainshtein' <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>, netslicing-chairs@ietf.org
Cc: ops-ads@ietf.org, netslices@ietf.org
References: <DB3PR03MB0969078FA60DD302A2D35E2E9D840@DB3PR03MB0969.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB3PR03MB0969078FA60DD302A2D35E2E9D840@DB3PR03MB0969.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 23:31:50 +0100
Message-ID: <003601d3e58a$07fdfdd0$17f9f970$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQEUXoKgFQ7pxZoiAxoojVO/kXHhPKWiVS2g
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.114.44.73
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-23828.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.298-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--5.298-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-23828.003
X-TMASE-Result: 10--5.298300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: QfHZjzml1E84HKI/yaqRm1aA5UKX+E3VhEIiqNvBrmP9Ez/5IpHqp8Ij FPOBlcLaYD54wsGHVAgh59UjwsalefRlMKh+3TBcSEQN/D/3cG7WSrKtwxqWpYe9IcL24mEgTq5 X+dsqASxk5c9keGiG7Mix45d/0wZDNRjTXGE2d8hgP1dNF1ow7TFFLhGUD8AWmmzaGKIwUHaUVu t/fDkNCBVNxcn9PB9wsUZQrAsB6FS0YC3nbjbPMcIMxCGh6u6XJVMDC8M9UM9eNs5tWYvjCQk9h gFqz4UG4vM1YF6AJbZcLc3sLtjOt+TCMddcL/gjOwBXM346/+zpb6eM7loDk87eTNvK3iJcGu4/ RxWjzGQfxtjhs6F3pkp+Sg7SwOV6
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/FuI36bTxbRLH7G1A7836xr6NxMY>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] COMS: What next?
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 22:32:03 -0000

Hi Sasha,

> My colleagues and I wonder what (if any) are the expected next
> steps of the COMS BOF.
> The status of this BOF at IETF-101 was Non-WG-forming. 

Right. The objectives were to get more focus and find answers to the questions
that the ADs had posed.

> My personal impression from reading the drafts and looking
> at the presentation at the session is that there is 

Oooh, you do know how to tantalise your audience, don't you?

Or possibly this is a competition and you will be awarding prizes for the best
completion of you sentence. ;-)

> Are there any plans to hold yet another session at IETF-102 in Montreal?
> To progress this BOF to a WG? Or simply to pass this subject to some other
> SDO?

You're asking the question on the right mailing list. But I have heard no plans
and have not seen anything recent in the IETF that seems like progress.

Maybe others will have something to say.

Cheers,
Adrian
--
Support an author and your imagination
Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales
More Tales from the Wood - Eighteen MORE new fairy tales
Tales from Beyond the Wood - A bumper collection of twenty-two new tales
https://www.feedaread.com/profiles/8604/
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924
Or buy from me direct.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email