Re: [Netslices] COMS: What next?

"Adrian Farrel" <> Sun, 06 May 2018 22:32 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DFE12D868; Sun, 6 May 2018 15:32:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.6
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v967AqgK6iAo; Sun, 6 May 2018 15:32:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219EA12426E; Sun, 6 May 2018 15:31:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w46MVsT4027453; Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:54 +0100
Received: from (unknown []) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EE022044; Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from (unknown []) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 439C922042; Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:54 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 ( []) (authenticated bits=0) by (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w46MVqLk018259 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:53 +0100
Reply-To: <>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <>
To: "'Alexander Vainshtein'" <>, <>
Cc: <>, <>
References: <>
In-Reply-To: <>
Date: Sun, 6 May 2018 23:31:50 +0100
Message-ID: <003601d3e58a$07fdfdd0$17f9f970$>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQEUXoKgFQ7pxZoiAxoojVO/kXHhPKWiVS2g
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-
X-TM-AS-Result: No--5.298-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--5.298-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Result: 10--5.298300-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: QfHZjzml1E84HKI/yaqRm1aA5UKX+E3VhEIiqNvBrmP9Ez/5IpHqp8Ij FPOBlcLaYD54wsGHVAgh59UjwsalefRlMKh+3TBcSEQN/D/3cG7WSrKtwxqWpYe9IcL24mEgTq5 X+dsqASxk5c9keGiG7Mix45d/0wZDNRjTXGE2d8hgP1dNF1ow7TFFLhGUD8AWmmzaGKIwUHaUVu t/fDkNCBVNxcn9PB9wsUZQrAsB6FS0YC3nbjbPMcIMxCGh6u6XJVMDC8M9UM9eNs5tWYvjCQk9h gFqz4UG4vM1YF6AJbZcLc3sLtjOt+TCMddcL/gjOwBXM346/+zpb6eM7loDk87eTNvK3iJcGu4/ RxWjzGQfxtjhs6F3pkp+Sg7SwOV6
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] COMS: What next?
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 22:32:03 -0000

Hi Sasha,

> My colleagues and I wonder what (if any) are the expected next
> steps of the COMS BOF.
> The status of this BOF at IETF-101 was Non-WG-forming. 

Right. The objectives were to get more focus and find answers to the questions
that the ADs had posed.

> My personal impression from reading the drafts and looking
> at the presentation at the session is that there is 

Oooh, you do know how to tantalise your audience, don't you?

Or possibly this is a competition and you will be awarding prizes for the best
completion of you sentence. ;-)

> Are there any plans to hold yet another session at IETF-102 in Montreal?
> To progress this BOF to a WG? Or simply to pass this subject to some other
> SDO?

You're asking the question on the right mailing list. But I have heard no plans
and have not seen anything recent in the IETF that seems like progress.

Maybe others will have something to say.

Support an author and your imagination
Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales
More Tales from the Wood - Eighteen MORE new fairy tales
Tales from Beyond the Wood - A bumper collection of twenty-two new tales
Or buy from me direct.