Re: [Netslices] COMS: What next?

"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Tue, 08 May 2018 08:51 UTC

Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: netslices@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72A9120727; Tue, 8 May 2018 01:51:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xIjBpmFFZdxv; Tue, 8 May 2018 01:51:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mta8.iomartmail.com (mta8.iomartmail.com [62.128.193.158]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2911F120726; Tue, 8 May 2018 01:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (vs2.iomartmail.com [10.12.10.123]) by mta8.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w488pZCp005219; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:51:35 +0100
Received: from vs2.iomartmail.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA3022042; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:51:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (unknown [10.12.10.249]) by vs2.iomartmail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A807822044; Tue, 8 May 2018 09:51:35 +0100 (BST)
Received: from 950129200 (73.44.114.87.dyn.plus.net [87.114.44.73]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w488pXWs020469 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 8 May 2018 09:51:34 +0100
Reply-To: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
From: "Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: "'Alexander Vainshtein'" <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>
Cc: <ops-ads@ietf.org>, <netslices@ietf.org>, <netslicing-chairs@ietf.org>
References: <DB3PR03MB0969078FA60DD302A2D35E2E9D840@DB3PR03MB0969.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <003601d3e58a$07fdfdd0$17f9f970$@olddog.co.uk> <DB5PR0301MB1909011B75FBF439E36FF16F9D9A0@DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <DB5PR0301MB1909011B75FBF439E36FF16F9D9A0@DB5PR0301MB1909.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 8 May 2018 09:51:30 +0100
Message-ID: <007001d3e6a9$c3dc1bc0$4b945340$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQEUXoKgFQ7pxZoiAxoojVO/kXHhPAHr+oyJAmRFpO6lghCW0A==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-Originating-IP: 87.114.44.73
X-Thinkmail-Auth: adrian@olddog.co.uk
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.0.1013-23830.006
X-TM-AS-Result: No--23.797-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--23.797-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-Version: IMSVA-9.0.0.1623-8.2.1013-23830.006
X-TMASE-Result: 10--23.796700-10.000000
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: H0/uSqZo4D7YfPOPCpnfAjPDkSOzeDWWp6dCliViMUwE2aoKQOZTG0BB kNz4/jwo1u3ngP4/lnZZpgBZgcDt62BUKvkvkMKu8eSmTJSmEv1R3sGN+j7mNC9+vUEmYLuG0u5 faGP8ztRebPKsovqW8DotoAMht58tFXIjCxL0BqvK09/T6AzbVlt06oMfzUpKXI+FvaKzIN1Wvb HYNqfZwK7ZfkjAg862rC/o+g4wFCKDpqrvaFLIqB47EGkpGeA9ph2uXdmolo/CkJHfGKxhL8DnF f1hKgwpTGXWkP5ReZs7ihjpDq1CU4x1g1lTiexdSxG/I0MjmF7g/EG5TeijVdqCxkzSpW/X6A2n iQYdR6fFisbZrMyfOQBrckZfSO2TqBA65KM+yMjpnOP6QxEGtvqtWPv3hAK2vQIe0iBJ63EnP8W WLvfAyFVuZQG2jzkwAEJ7/OKHF1e0YC3nbjbPMTCj6xe3SuezB4Id7CiQcz9uV9kGkYaKQqY5Zk wz5JFbL2eWU+NIX0YwgiQkmd3VBR/yubtiMTISsFkCLeeufNtaO9rZ9+tN7cRRhKD68wBno8WMk QWv6iV95l0nVeyiuL9FcG1YeQiea9+JVKonO7fcyHXbbFd0K53npjOSzjgKC24oEZ6SpSkgbhiV sIMQKxZ5+8y352uC
X-TMASE-SNAP-Result: 1.821001.0001-0-1-12:0,22:0,33:0,34:0-0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netslices/oOANEOj7FhCYejbN4p8w6PJ0yGg>
Subject: Re: [Netslices] COMS: What next?
X-BeenThere: netslices@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "This list is intended for discussion and review of network slicing at IETF." <netslices.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/netslices/>
List-Post: <mailto:netslices@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netslices>, <mailto:netslices-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 08:51:45 -0000

Yes, and without pretending to speak for the whole room in London, there were
some observations made that L2SM and L3SM were "primitive" forms of slicing, and
that ACTN (see TEAS WG) constructs virtual networks over underlying transport
networks and is also slicing.

Some people, thus, are in agreement with you. Other,  I think, believe that the
problem space is larger and more complex.

A

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Vainshtein [mailto:Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com]
> Sent: 08 May 2018 09:16
> To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
> Cc: ops-ads@ietf.org; netslices@ietf.org; netslicing-chairs@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Netslices] COMS: What next?
> 
> Adrian,
> Lots of thanks for a prompt response and sincere apologies for sending out an
> incomplete email.
> 
> The completion of the sentence that has puzzled you should be something like:
> 
> " My personal impression from reading the drafts and looking at the
> presentation at the session is that there is certain similarity between the
Service
> Delivery Interface (SDI) mentioned there and the YANG data models for
> L3/L2VPN services. Developing a YANG data model for network slices as services
> (NSaaS) therefore looks like a reasonable objective for a dedicated IETF WG to
> me".
> 
> Hopefully this clarifies my original question.
> 
> Regards,
> Sasha
> 
> Office: +972-39266302
> Cell:      +972-549266302
> Email:   Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adrian@olddog.co.uk]
> Sent: Monday, May 7, 2018 1:32 AM
> To: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>;; netslicing-
> chairs@ietf.org
> Cc: ops-ads@ietf.org; netslices@ietf.org
> Subject: RE: [Netslices] COMS: What next?
> 
> Hi Sasha,
> 
> > My colleagues and I wonder what (if any) are the expected next steps
> > of the COMS BOF.
> > The status of this BOF at IETF-101 was Non-WG-forming.
> 
> Right. The objectives were to get more focus and find answers to the questions
> that the ADs had posed.
> 
> > My personal impression from reading the drafts and looking at the
> > presentation at the session is that there is
> 
> Oooh, you do know how to tantalise your audience, don't you?
> 
> Or possibly this is a competition and you will be awarding prizes for the best
> completion of you sentence. ;-)
> 
> > Are there any plans to hold yet another session at IETF-102 in Montreal?
> > To progress this BOF to a WG? Or simply to pass this subject to some
> > other SDO?
> 
> You're asking the question on the right mailing list. But I have heard no
plans and
> have not seen anything recent in the IETF that seems like progress.
> 
> Maybe others will have something to say.
> 
> Cheers,
> Adrian
> --
> Support an author and your imagination
> Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales More Tales from the Wood -
> Eighteen MORE new fairy tales Tales from Beyond the Wood - A bumper
> collection of twenty-two new tales
> http://webdefence.global.blackspider.com/urlwrap/?q=AXicHcqxDcIwEAXQ31Gz
> iG2RKAQq6GhoQ0Fl4otiybGj8wmHPVgIiRmYB0H93nqF6wd4vgEOD9PeVOa7mqw
> PfYrCKag-TSh1c-
> 7kcjLVZldtcQy02OiIVWd9zKOQjwfqvVCg_x9F5rzXupSiBiJnmaz7iZ45DT5Q1m1jag1
> geQFflGksFQ&Z
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924
> Or buy from me direct.
> 
> 
> 
> ______________________________________________________________
> _____________
> 
> This e-mail message is intended for the recipient only and contains
information
> which is
> CONFIDENTIAL and which may be proprietary to ECI Telecom. If you have
> received this
> transmission in error, please inform us by e-mail, phone or fax, and then
delete
> the original
> and all copies thereof.
> ______________________________________________________________
> _____________