[New-wg-docs] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-00.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Fri, 14 February 2020 21:49 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: new-wg-docs@ietf.org
Delivered-To: new-wg-docs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93ADD1201CE for <new-wg-docs@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:49:04 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: new-wg-docs@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.117.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <158171694455.16207.5929559905577142096@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 13:49:04 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/new-wg-docs/JvoNOgFp9g0whEooeRPrypn6lHA>
Subject: [New-wg-docs] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-00.txt
X-BeenThere: new-wg-docs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: <new-wg-docs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/new-wg-docs>, <mailto:new-wg-docs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/new-wg-docs/>
List-Post: <mailto:new-wg-docs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:new-wg-docs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/new-wg-docs>, <mailto:new-wg-docs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:49:05 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Registration Protocols Extensions WG of the IETF. Title : Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Unhandled Namespaces Authors : James Gould Martin Casanova Filename : draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-00.txt Pages : 18 Date : 2020-02-14 Abstract: The Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP), as defined in RFC 5730, includes a method for the client and server to determine the objects to be managed during a session and the object extensions to be used during a session. The services are identified using namespace URIs. How should the server handle service data that needs to be returned in the response when the client does not support the required service namespace URI, which is referred to as an unhandled namespace? An unhandled namespace is a significant issue for the processing of RFC 5730 poll messages, since poll messages are inserted by the server prior to knowing the supported client services, and the client needs to be capable of processing all poll messages. This document defines an operational practice that enables the server to return information associated with unhandled namespace URIs that is compliant with the negotiated services defined in RFC 5730. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-00 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-regext-unhandled-namespaces-00 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [New-wg-docs] I-D Action: draft-ietf-regext-unhan… internet-drafts