[New-wg-docs] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-00.txt

internet-drafts@ietf.org Tue, 27 April 2021 14:33 UTC

Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: new-wg-docs@ietf.org
Delivered-To: new-wg-docs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904113A0CB9 for <new-wg-docs@ietf.org>; Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:33:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: <new-wg-docs@ietf.org>
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.28.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <161953399355.25647.3635620150108820737@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 07:33:13 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/new-wg-docs/w8akYwArH1J9eGpWMIHakSlNbPw>
Subject: [New-wg-docs] I-D Action: draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-00.txt
X-BeenThere: new-wg-docs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: <new-wg-docs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/new-wg-docs>, <mailto:new-wg-docs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/new-wg-docs/>
List-Post: <mailto:new-wg-docs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:new-wg-docs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/new-wg-docs>, <mailto:new-wg-docs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2021 14:33:14 -0000

A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the SIDR Operations WG of the IETF.

        Title           : Problem Statement and Considerations for ROA containing Multiple Prefixes
        Authors         : Zhiwei Yan
                          Randy Bush
                          Guanggang Geng
                          Jiankang Yao
	Filename        : draft-ietf-sidrops-roa-considerations-00.txt
	Pages           : 6
	Date            : 2021-04-24

   The address space holder needs to issue an ROA object when it
   authorizes one or more ASes to originate routes to multiple prefixes.
   During the process of ROA issuance, the address space holder needs to
   specify an origin AS for a list of IP prefixes.  Besides, the address
   space holder has a free choice to put multiple prefixes into a single
   ROA or issue separate ROAs for each prefix based on the current
   specification.  This memo analyzes and presents some operational
   problems which may be caused by the ROAs containing multiple IP
   prefixes.  Some suggestions and considerations also have been

The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:

There are also htmlized versions available at:

Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.

Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: