IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Wed, 26 May 2010 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110823A67FF; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:04:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id x4glOGTiLZqA; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A270C3A67EA; Tue, 25 May 2010 20:04:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from squire.local (198-135-0-233.cisco.com [198.135.0.233]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCBE940E44; Tue, 25 May 2010 21:04:04 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4BFC8FA3.9030807@stpeter.im>
Date: Tue, 25 May 2010 23:04:03 -0400
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
References: <20100511173002.3EB993A6D0F@core3.amsl.com> <tslzkzxjfmh.fsf@mit.edu> <4BF2D57F.8090807@viagenie.ca> <tsltyq5hxq5.fsf@mit.edu> <4BF2DD30.8030702@viagenie.ca> <4BF3EA68.6050103@stpeter.im> <4BF3EAD6.3010108@viagenie.ca> <tsl1vd7hmrf.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsl1vd7hmrf.fsf@mit.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg="sha1"; boundary="------------ms020603070801040806050505"
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov, ietf@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, aland@freeradius.org, newprep@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)
X-BeenThere: newprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Stringprep after IDNA2008 <newprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/newprep>
List-Post: <mailto:newprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 03:04:16 -0000

On 5/19/10 12:36 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
> I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've brought up
> in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph would be a
> significant step backward.  I would object to chartering the group with
> that paragraph added without explicitly listing any use cases including
> the onse I brought up that have come forward in this discussion.

As always, text is welcome. :)

I proposed:

   Although the group will seek input from and may provide advice to
   "customers" working on other technologies, it will prioritize work
   on the above-listed stringprep profiles and will take on additional
   tasks as official milestones only after rechartering.

Seemingly you would prefer:

   Based on normal working group processes for achieving consensus, the
   group will attempt to gather input from, and may provide advice to,
   "customers" working on other IETF technologies, including but not
   limited to Network Address Identifiers (RFC 4282) and Kerberos (RFC
   4120).  However, the group will prioritize work on the previously
   listed stringprep profiles above work on other technologies, and
   will formally accept additional tasks as official milestones only
   after rechartering.

Peter

-- 
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email