Re: [newprep] wg/newprep project: clarification asked

[jefsey <[e-mail]>]

At 22:56 01/06/2010, Mark Lentczner wrote:

>On May 19, 2010, at 2:35 PM, JFC Morfin wrote:
>
> > My question is therefore:
> >
> > -          "a need is identified by our Internet user 
> contributing party. This need is for a stable, unique, 
> comprehensive manner to orthotypographically format prepared 
> strings whatever the script and language. Such a format must 
> prevent phishing and support a single registry indexing and sorting 
> order of every possible orthotypographic string, throughout the 
> Internet protocols, related applications, and interoperated technologies.
> > -          Is this or is this not also an immediate or ultimate 
> goal for the AD, WG Chair, and WG/newprep possible participants?"
>
>This is not my goal for a newprep WG: It is too broad in aims, and 
>unrealistic that a single method would serve all protocols and applications.

This is not the documented aim.
The documented aim was illustrated with the ISO 3166-4 needed 
stringprep: the Internet exemple (Bulgarian case) is to permit an 
IDNxTLD registration on a first come first serve basis.
Best
jfc