Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Thu, 27 May 2010 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 721D13A6B2F; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:08:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.295
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.295 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.111, BAYES_20=-0.74, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ts9SZOWEVWPj; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C393A6B2D; Thu, 27 May 2010 09:08:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84833203C0; Thu, 27 May 2010 12:07:58 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 82CF043EF; Thu, 27 May 2010 12:07:28 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
References: <20100511173002.3EB993A6D0F@core3.amsl.com> <tslzkzxjfmh.fsf@mit.edu> <4BF2D57F.8090807@viagenie.ca> <tsltyq5hxq5.fsf@mit.edu> <4BF2DD30.8030702@viagenie.ca> <4BF3EA68.6050103@stpeter.im> <4BF3EAD6.3010108@viagenie.ca> <tsl1vd7hmrf.fsf@mit.edu> <4BFC8FA3.9030807@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 12:07:28 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4BFC8FA3.9030807@stpeter.im> (Peter Saint-Andre's message of "Tue, 25 May 2010 23:04:03 -0400")
Message-ID: <tslzkzl1g73.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov, ietf@ietf.org, newprep@ietf.org, aland@freeradius.org, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)
X-BeenThere: newprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Stringprep after IDNA2008 <newprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/newprep>
List-Post: <mailto:newprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 May 2010 16:08:08 -0000

>>>>> "Peter" == Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> writes:

    Peter> On 5/19/10 12:36 PM, Sam Hartman wrote:
    >> I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've
    >> brought up in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph
    Peter> I proposed:

    Peter>    Although the group will seek input from and may provide
    Peter> advice to "customers" working on other technologies, it will
    Peter> prioritize work on the above-listed stringprep profiles and
    Peter> will take on additional tasks as official milestones only
    Peter> after rechartering.

I am actually fine with this if you note in the above text that Kerberos
needs to be considered when considering SASLPREP and explicitly add RFC
4282.

What I'm objecting to is prioritizing the list of stringprep profiles
you've identified to other stringprep profiles that came up during the
discussion of the charter.