IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [newprep] wg/newprep project: clarification asked

Mark Lentczner <markl@lindenlab.com> Tue, 01 June 2010 20:57 UTC

Return-Path: <markl@lindenlab.com>
X-Original-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 785E228C143 for <newprep@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:57:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CKKdkHMuJVXK for <newprep@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-px0-f172.google.com (mail-px0-f172.google.com [209.85.212.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 918A728C14D for <newprep@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Jun 2010 13:57:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pxi19 with SMTP id 19so2445067pxi.31 for <newprep@ietf.org>; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.56.6 with SMTP id e6mr5225305rva.81.1275425808250; Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:56:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nil.lindenlab.com ([38.99.52.137]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm28168pzk.12.2010.06.01.13.56.46 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:56:46 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078)
From: Mark Lentczner <markl@lindenlab.com>
In-Reply-To: <7.0.1.0.2.20100519230359.05dfd258@jefsey.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:56:44 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F6EBD01F-868D-48AD-A867-D0F021DC011A@lindenlab.com>
References: <E9728BD9-05DE-485B-B2DB-7F3D440B49E6@lindenlab.com> <7.0.1.0.2.20100519230359.05dfd258@jefsey.com>
To: newprep@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078)
Subject: Re: [newprep] wg/newprep project: clarification asked
X-BeenThere: newprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Stringprep after IDNA2008 <newprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/newprep>
List-Post: <mailto:newprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:57:07 -0000

On May 19, 2010, at 2:35 PM, JFC Morfin wrote:

> My question is therefore:
> 
> -          "a need is identified by our Internet user contributing party. This need is for a stable, unique, comprehensive manner to orthotypographically format prepared strings whatever the script and language. Such a format must prevent phishing and support a single registry indexing and sorting order of every possible orthotypographic string, throughout the Internet protocols, related applications, and interoperated technologies.
> -          Is this or is this not also an immediate or ultimate goal for the AD, WG Chair, and WG/newprep possible participants?"

This is not my goal for a newprep WG: It is too broad in aims, and unrealistic that a single method would serve all protocols and applications.

	- Mark



Mark Lentczner
Sr. Systems Architect
Technology Integration
Linden Lab

markl@lindenlab.com

Zero Linden
zero.linden@secondlife.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email