Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)
Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> Tue, 18 May 2010 18:36 UTC
Return-Path: <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27AC3A6AF9; Tue, 18 May 2010 11:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.889
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.889 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.222, BAYES_05=-1.11, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cuy-vLx9dHlu; Tue, 18 May 2010 11:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000:226:55ff:fe57:14db]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE61D3A6846; Tue, 18 May 2010 11:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from h121.viagenie.ca (unknown [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000:5ab0:35ff:fef4:6fa]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D16520D19; Tue, 18 May 2010 14:32:17 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4BF2DD30.8030702@viagenie.ca>
Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 14:32:16 -0400
From: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; fr; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
References: <20100511173002.3EB993A6D0F@core3.amsl.com> <tslzkzxjfmh.fsf@mit.edu> <4BF2D57F.8090807@viagenie.ca> <tsltyq5hxq5.fsf@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <tsltyq5hxq5.fsf@mit.edu>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov, newprep@ietf.org, iesg@ietf.org, aland@freeradius.org, ietf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)
X-BeenThere: newprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Stringprep after IDNA2008 <newprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/newprep>
List-Post: <mailto:newprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 18:36:56 -0000
Le 10-05-18 14:27, Sam Hartman a écrit : >>>>>> "Marc" == Marc Blanchet<marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca> writes: > > Marc> we had a discussion about the same subject: i.e. should we > Marc> restrict the scope to a specific set of documents to > Marc> review/update/... or do we keep some provision for other > Marc> documents coming in the stream that require "help" of the > Marc> newprep. I was arguing for the latter. To me, what you are > Marc> talking about is the latter. Obviously, some people wanted the > Marc> charter to be restrictive in order to not go all over the > Marc> place, and I agree in principle... However, this work is kinda > Marc> horizontal: touches many areas, so having a more large view of > Marc> the problem space and documents that depends on this newprep > Marc> work would be very valuable to the working group > Marc> work. Therefore, I'm more for opening a bit the charter for > Marc> the cases like the ones you are talking about. > > I'm happy with a restrictive charter so long as the work areas > identified today (including mine) are included. my guess is that we most likely will discover other issues/newprep potential "customers" as we go, that it might be useful to work on, since they have a lot of similarities with the others official in the charter. therefore, more "opened" than closed charter. Marc. > I'm happy drawing a > line in the sand and saying "here's what we'll touch first," so long as > people who bring up items now get included. I'd probably be happier > with a reasonably open charter. > > I'm not at all happy if the items I bring up or other similar items > brought up now are excluded. -- ========= IPv6 book: Migrating to IPv6, Wiley. http://www.ipv6book.ca Stun/Turn server for VoIP NAT-FW traversal: http://numb.viagenie.ca DTN news service: http://reeves.viagenie.ca NAT64-DNS64 Opensource: http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
- [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG… IESG Secretary
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… JFC Morfin
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Marc Blanchet
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Mark Lentczner
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Alan DeKok
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Peter Saint-Andre
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Jiankang YAO
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Sam Hartman
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Alexey Melnikov
- Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA200… Sam Hartman