Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Wed, 19 May 2010 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <hartmans@mit.edu>
X-Original-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: newprep@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8FC3A6BAE; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:36:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.799
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.799 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.534, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id glBPBM4wqW9r; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:36:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.suchdamage.org (permutation-city.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.28]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28E893A6BA1; Wed, 19 May 2010 09:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "laptop", Issuer "laptop" (not verified)) by mail.suchdamage.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A996120B43; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:36:34 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org (Postfix, from userid 8042) id D6ED643EF; Wed, 19 May 2010 12:36:20 -0400 (EDT)
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
To: Marc Blanchet <marc.blanchet@viagenie.ca>
References: <20100511173002.3EB993A6D0F@core3.amsl.com> <tslzkzxjfmh.fsf@mit.edu> <4BF2D57F.8090807@viagenie.ca> <tsltyq5hxq5.fsf@mit.edu> <4BF2DD30.8030702@viagenie.ca> <4BF3EA68.6050103@stpeter.im> <4BF3EAD6.3010108@viagenie.ca>
Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 12:36:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <4BF3EAD6.3010108@viagenie.ca> (Marc Blanchet's message of "Wed, 19 May 2010 09:42:46 -0400")
Message-ID: <tsl1vd7hmrf.fsf@mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110009 (No Gnus v0.9) Emacs/22.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: ietf-krb-wg@anl.gov, ietf@ietf.org, newprep@ietf.org, aland@freeradius.org, Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@MIT.EDU>, iesg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [newprep] WG Review: Stringprep after IDNA2008 WG (newprep)
X-BeenThere: newprep@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Stringprep after IDNA2008 <newprep.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/newprep>
List-Post: <mailto:newprep@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/newprep>, <mailto:newprep-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 May 2010 16:36:46 -0000

I believe that without explicitly listing the use cases I've brought up
in the body of the charter, the additional paragraph would be a
significant step backward.  I would object to chartering the group with
that paragraph added without explicitly listing any use cases including
the onse I brought up that have come forward in this discussion.