IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 10 May 2005 15:16 UTC

Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA05171 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2005 11:16:33 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4AFFYfv015471; Tue, 10 May 2005 08:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j4AFFYPT015464; Tue, 10 May 2005 08:15:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (carter-zimmerman.suchdamage.org [69.25.196.178]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4AFFUSF015065 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 10 May 2005 08:15:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 61575E0063; Tue, 10 May 2005 10:10:23 -0400 (EDT)
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, New Track <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>, Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, John Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, John Loughney <john.loughney@nokia.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal
References: <tsloebxg3u3.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <42806810.1010408@zurich.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505101317320.13234@netcore.fi>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:10:23 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505101317320.13234@netcore.fi> (Pekka Savola's message of "Tue, 10 May 2005 13:29:39 +0300 (EEST)")
Message-ID: <tslbr7ji33k.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>

>>>>> "Pekka" == Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> writes:

    Pekka> to produce such documents.  So the question is, doesn't the
    Pekka> IESG see the need for roadmaps (or similar documents) as
    Pekka> the WGs aren't chartered to produce them ?

I certainly don't think the IESG has time to write these documents
ourselves.  I think that the reason that these aren't typically
chartered is lack of available effort.  

If you can find people with the time to work on some particular
technology roadmap, by all means propose a BOF or charter modification
to existing working group.

Whether such documents are ISDs or RFCs is mostly orthogonal to how
much effort is required.  If we have people to do the work it can
happen.  Otherwise it will not.

--Sam

.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email