IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal

Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com> Wed, 11 May 2005 09:36 UTC

Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id FAA17034 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Wed, 11 May 2005 05:36:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4B9Z7te027659; Wed, 11 May 2005 02:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j4B9Z7iQ027658; Wed, 11 May 2005 02:35:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtagate2.de.ibm.com (mtagate2.de.ibm.com [195.212.29.151]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4B9Z5rJ027604 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Wed, 11 May 2005 02:35:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.167.49]) by mtagate2.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j4B9YxSp148868 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Wed, 11 May 2005 09:34:59 GMT
Received: from d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com [9.149.165.212]) by d12nrmr1607.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.10/NCO/VER6.6) with ESMTP id j4B9YwoP290202 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:34:59 +0200
Received: from d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.13.3) with ESMTP id j4B9YwWG002250 for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:34:58 +0200
Received: from sihl.zurich.ibm.com (sihl.zurich.ibm.com [9.4.16.232]) by d12av01.megacenter.de.ibm.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j4B9YwHt002239; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:34:58 +0200
Received: from zurich.ibm.com (sig-9-146-217-161.de.ibm.com [9.146.217.161]) by sihl.zurich.ibm.com (AIX4.3/8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA68366; Wed, 11 May 2005 11:34:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4281D1BC.8080908@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:34:52 +0200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Organization: IBM
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113
X-Accept-Language: en, fr, de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bruce Lilly <blilly@erols.com>
CC: NEWTRK <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>
Subject: Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal
References: <198A730C2044DE4A96749D13E167AD3725024C@MOU1WNEXMB04.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <200505101457.59651.blilly@erols.com>
In-Reply-To: <200505101457.59651.blilly@erols.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Bruce Lilly wrote:
> On Tue May 10 2005 11:48, Hallam-Baker, Phillip wrote:
...
> 
> More to the point, the original claim, viz. "the Internet runs mainly on
> Proposed Standards", still hasn't been substantiated.  Even if you ignore
> the same *type* of process, there is no way that IP is a mere "Proposed
> Standard".

RFC 791 (STD) is updated by RFC 1349 (PS).
RFC 1349 is obsoleted by RFC 2474 (PS).

And so it goes wherever you look. Fortunately, we have running code
to save us.

    Brian



.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email