Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Ec60O-00042H-Nl for newtrk-archive@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:58:08 -0500 Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (mailapps.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.45]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA18154 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 13:57:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailapps.uoregon.edu (IDENT:U2FsdGVkX19plYCVMuqvs5lpleyarS0mvhGQL7CMA8k@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAFIq8JJ006851; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:52:08 -0800 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5/Submit) id jAFIq8te006850; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:52:08 -0800 Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3-in.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by mailapps.uoregon.edu (8.13.5/8.13.5) with ESMTP id jAFIq84C006845 for ; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:52:08 -0800 Received: from sj-core-5.cisco.com ([171.71.177.238]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2005 10:52:03 -0800 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.97,334,1125903600"; d="scan'208"; a="365530266:sNHT24135596" Received: from imail.cisco.com (imail.cisco.com [128.107.200.91]) by sj-core-5.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id jAFIq05q010012; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:52:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from [212.254.247.3] (ams-clip-vpn-dhcp445.cisco.com [10.61.65.189]) by imail.cisco.com (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id jAFJ0hOE026858; Tue, 15 Nov 2005 11:00:44 -0800 Message-ID: <437A2E4E.3020704@cisco.com> Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 19:51:58 +0100 From: Eliot Lear User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Macintosh/20051025) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "C. M. Heard" CC: New Track , iana@iana.org Subject: Re: [newtrk] Last Call comments on draft-ietf-newtrk-decruft-experiment-01.txt References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; l=257; t=1132081244; x=1132513444; c=nowsp; s=nebraska; h=Subject:From:Date:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; d=cisco.com; i=lear@cisco.com; z=Subject:Re=3A=20[newtrk]=20Last=20Call=20comments=20on=20draft-ietf-newtrk-decru ft-experiment-01.txt| From:Eliot=20Lear=20| Date:Tue,=2015=20Nov=202005=2019=3A51=3A58=20+0100| Content-Type:text/plain=3B=20charset=3DISO-8859-1=3B=20format=3Dflowed| Content-Transfer-Encoding:7bit; b=niwElAxaV476Arb0kpqK7H/ZEimoGgUKQX1mI8RTyuOi/mx+C4jP3z7zYcqUldURcBlLqnJL 2uTrOGV5pBYotKoCdEo5WqJl4tswTwgamMddwpJ782sCGrh8dR9V0s6t7UdFxPCMVE5ytFO3ltB GLoDXu5E82yO8ks0hXZjRhOY= Authentication-Results: imail.cisco.com; header.From=lear@cisco.com; dkim=pass ( message from cisco.com verified; ); X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1175/Tue Nov 15 09:50:47 2005 on mailapps X-Virus-Status: Clean Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit C. M. Heard wrote: > Why is decruft a special case that requires special handling > regarding references? Just by numbers. It's the only document that changes the status of so many standards. That might not remain the case in the future, but it might. This is why I'd like to hear from the IANA on the matter. Eliot . newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html