IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal

Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu> Tue, 10 May 2005 19:33 UTC

Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu [128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id PAA06191 for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2005 15:33:52 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4AJWuqB006699; Tue, 10 May 2005 12:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j4AJWud7006696; Tue, 10 May 2005 12:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (CARTER-ZIMMERMAN.MIT.EDU [18.18.3.197]) by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4AJWnqn006577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NOT) for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 10 May 2005 12:32:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by carter-zimmerman.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 8042) id 74E5CE0063; Tue, 10 May 2005 15:32:45 -0400 (EDT)
To: Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi>
Cc: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>, New Track <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>, Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>, John Klensin <klensin@jck.com>, John Loughney <john.loughney@nokia.com>, IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal
References: <tsloebxg3u3.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <42806810.1010408@zurich.ibm.com> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505101317320.13234@netcore.fi> <tslbr7ji33k.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505102202310.24083@netcore.fi>
From: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 15:32:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0505102202310.24083@netcore.fi> (Pekka Savola's message of "Tue, 10 May 2005 22:06:16 +0300 (EEST)")
Message-ID: <tslmzr26fmq.fsf@cz.mit.edu>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Sam Hartman <hartmans-ietf@mit.edu>

>>>>> "Pekka" == Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> writes:

    Pekka> My point is: if the IESG thought roadmap documents were
    Pekka> important, such docs would be much more commonplace in the
    Pekka> WG charters.

That's not how it works.  If we don't believe that people will do the
work we tend not to charter it.

So you'd see it in charter if the IESG believed there was interest in
a particular case or if the IESG believed it was so important in a
particular case that the general work should not proceed without it.

.
newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________
web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html
mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email