Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal
Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org> Tue, 10 May 2005 17:40 UTC
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (root@darkwing.uoregon.edu
[128.223.142.13]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA24773
for <newtrk-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 10 May 2005 13:40:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from darkwing.uoregon.edu (majordom@localhost [127.0.0.1])
by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4AHVrKr005436;
Tue, 10 May 2005 10:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j4AHVrZ4005432;
Tue, 10 May 2005 10:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from harry.mail-abuse.org (Harry.Mail-Abuse.ORG [168.61.5.27])
by darkwing.uoregon.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j4AHVqFn005325
for <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>; Tue, 10 May 2005 10:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SJC-Office-DHCP-156.Mail-Abuse.ORG
(SJC-Office-DHCP-156.Mail-Abuse.ORG [168.61.10.156])
by harry.mail-abuse.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 40039414EE; Tue, 10 May 2005 10:31:47 -0700 (PDT)
Subject: Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal
From: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brc@zurich.ibm.com>
Cc: New Track <newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu>
In-Reply-To: <42806810.1010408@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <tsloebxg3u3.fsf@cz.mit.edu> <42806810.1010408@zurich.ibm.com>
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 10:31:46 -0700
Message-Id: <1115746306.6494.49.camel@SJC-Office-DHCP-156.mail-abuse.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-newtrk@lists.uoregon.edu
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Douglas Otis <dotis@mail-abuse.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
On Tue, 2005-05-10 at 09:51 +0200, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > The first approach is to treat the ISDs as a light-weight replacement > for the three-level standards track. The goal would be to make ISDs > very simple; minimize text in the document and make an ISD little more > than a collection of links and metadata. This would, in effect, give > IETF blessing to the realities that the Internet runs mainly on > Proposed Standards and that the STD series has failed as a > citation series. Keep the ISDs effectively as simple meta-glue to guide developers in understanding currently related documents. This service would be most welcome. Creating automated links to errata and contemporaneous overviews of these related documents would ensure important information not escape notice. The meta-glue should not require an author, nor alter content of any RFC. The referenced overview can be a separate process, facilitated by a meta-glue approach. Rather than developing a two-tier standards process, all authoritative information should remain within the RFC. The overviews, as created and updated, would comment on implementation experience only. If there is a desire to alter an RFC, write an RFC. Such a rule would preserve process clarity. Unlike the RFC, an overview would be more of a living document, with a similar nature to that of errata, which notes corrections as discovered. An overview would document which RFCs and related options are presently used, and therefore add value to the RFC. These overviews could effectively play the role of declaring status, but in a less formal manner. Having this ISD meta-glue kept a separate effort from errata or an ongoing overview process, should ensure prompt deployment, while still offering significant value. -Doug . newtrk resources:_____________________________________________________ web user interface: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk.html mhonarc archive: http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~llynch/newtrk/index.html
- [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Sam Hartman
- RE: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Douglas Otis
- RE: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Bruce Lilly
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Pekka Savola
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Spencer Dawkins
- RE: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Scott Bradner
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Sam Hartman
- Re: [newtrk] IESG comments on ISD proposal Spencer Dawkins