[nfsv4] Deb Cooley's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-layoutwcc-05: (with COMMENT)

[Deb Cooley via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Deb Cooley has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-layoutwcc-05: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/ 
for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-layoutwcc/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Section 5:  Security Considerations:   It seems odd to me that allowing the DS
and MDS on different servers doesn't drive a security concern.  Given this
draft is a refinement to RFC8435, do the security considerations from that RFC
apply to this draft?

Thanks to Ben Schwartz for his secdir review, and to Carsten Bormann, who
parenthetically alludes to this situation.