[nfsv4] [Errata Verified] RFC5661 (3379)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Fri, 25 October 2019 08:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 902F6120169; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:29:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2LmlSK_D-Wpw; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [4.31.198.49]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 051EA12001E; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:29:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id B4962F4071F; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:29:23 -0700 (PDT)
To: Asmita.Karandikar@netapp.com, shepler@storspeed.com, mike@eisler.com, dnoveck@netapp.com
X-PHP-Originating-Script: 30:errata_mail_lib.php
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Cc: magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com, iesg@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Message-Id: <20191025082923.B4962F4071F@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 01:29:23 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/1jtX8eeJ4oNxMOSXPGkF-AqKeRE>
Subject: [nfsv4] [Errata Verified] RFC5661 (3379)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:29:26 -0000
The following errata report has been verified for RFC5661, "Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid3379 -------------------------------------- Status: Verified Type: Technical Reported by: Asmita Karandikar <Asmita.Karandikar@netapp.com> Date Reported: 2012-10-15 Verified by: Magnus Westerlund (IESG) Section: 18.50.3 Original Text ------------- If there are sessions (both idle and non-idle), opens, locks, delegations, layouts, and/or wants (Section 18.49) associated with the unexpired lease of the client ID, the server MUST return NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY. Corrected Text -------------- If there are sessions (both idle and non-idle), opens, locks, delegations, and/or wants (Section 18.49) associated with the unexpired lease of the client ID, the server MUST return NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY. Notes ----- Should not include layouts. A forgetful client may not return LAYOUTS. In this case, a server will always return NFS4ERR_CLIENTID_BUSY on DESTROY_CLIENTID and end up persisting the client’s lease until it expires although the client is explicitly asking us not to. -------------------------------------- RFC5661 (draft-ietf-nfsv4-minorversion1-29) -------------------------------------- Title : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol Publication Date : January 2010 Author(s) : S. Shepler, Ed., M. Eisler, Ed., D. Noveck, Ed. Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Network File System Version 4 Area : Transport Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [nfsv4] [Errata Verified] RFC5661 (3379) RFC Errata System