IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1

sfaibish <sfaibish@emc.com> Mon, 18 October 2010 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <sfaibish@emc.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B31F3A6EB3 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:47:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.292, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PQ+pKDmce4r4 for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:47:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mexforward.lss.emc.com (mexforward.lss.emc.com [128.222.32.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0523A6BA7 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 13:47:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (HOP04-L1D11-SI03.isus.emc.com [10.254.111.23]) by mexforward.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o9IKmodt025070 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:48:50 -0400
Received: from mailhub.lss.emc.com (mailhub.lss.emc.com [10.254.221.251]) by hop04-l1d11-si03.isus.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:48:40 -0400
Received: from usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com (USENSFAIBISL2E.eng.emc.com [10.238.120.90]) by mailhub.lss.emc.com (Switch-3.4.3/Switch-3.4.3) with ESMTP id o9IKmDoW027722; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:48:13 -0400
To: Spencer Shepler <sshepler@microsoft.com>, "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
From: sfaibish <sfaibish@emc.com>
Organization: EMC
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; delsp="yes"; charset="iso-8859-15"
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <E043D9D8EE3B5743B8B174A814FD584F0C98E09C@TK5EX14MBXC131.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:48:13 -0400
Message-ID: <op.vkshenyqunckof@usensfaibisl2e.eng.emc.com>
In-Reply-To: <E043D9D8EE3B5743B8B174A814FD584F0C98E09C@TK5EX14MBXC131.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
User-Agent: Opera Mail/9.10 (Win32)
X-EMM-MHVC: 1
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Current implementation status of NFSv4.1
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:47:57 -0000

On Mon, 18 Oct 2010 16:30:13 -0400, Spencer Shepler  
<sshepler@microsoft.com> wrote:

>
> I am curious if anyone is interested and able to do a
> presentation at the upcoming WG meeting on 4.1 implementation
> status?  Given the nature of the interop testing (NDAs) I am
> not asking for an industry report but more of an experience
> so far and status for single implementations.  Covering
> things like: functionality implemented, issues found, issues
> unresolved, areas of concern, lessons learned for future work.
Very good idea. I vote for it and I will send my issues found
at BAT. Thank you

/Sorin

> That type of thing.
>
> Anyone interested?
>
> Thanks,
> Spencer
>
> p.s. Obviously, this could include NFSv4.0 as well. :-)
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>
>



-- 
Best Regards

Sorin Faibish
Corporate Distinguished Engineer
Unified Storage Division
         EMC²
where information lives

Phone: 508-249-5745
Cellphone: 617-510-0422
Email : sfaibish@emc.com

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email