Re: [nfsv4] one umask-02 question

"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> Fri, 02 December 2016 21:16 UTC

Return-Path: <bfields@fieldses.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00D8129408 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:16:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.896, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eykyvtQNU_Ih for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fieldses.org (fieldses.org [173.255.197.46]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3072A128E19 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 13:16:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by fieldses.org (Postfix, from userid 2815) id C7DFF4A2F; Fri, 2 Dec 2016 16:16:53 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 16:16:53 -0500
From: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org>
To: Andreas Gruenbacher <agruenba@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20161202211653.GA16941@fieldses.org>
References: <3471.1480623047@athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com> <CADaq8jeHsqRi8PEJPVs0uma_9TjGrFVj=-yq-4NF-9awX6wP0g@mail.gmail.com> <20161201220137.GA1589@fieldses.org> <CAHc6FU6OkNWi1HP79auC10pqF03DJcm2kExNLhg9z-ofDRjmYA@mail.gmail.com> <5607.1480708786@athyra-vm1.us.oracle.com> <CAHc6FU54yTFrMR-O=r-wY0os-UgViRpb_U9kijkN+LDNZW6EJA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAHc6FU54yTFrMR-O=r-wY0os-UgViRpb_U9kijkN+LDNZW6EJA@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/2AXFUm5CSzHzgu2eK_PztzaJPfs>
Cc: "nfsv4@ietf.org" <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] one umask-02 question
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 02 Dec 2016 21:16:55 -0000

On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 09:32:20PM +0100, Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:59 PM, Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer@oracle.com> wrote:
> > Andreas Gruenbacher wrote:
> >
> >> returning INVAL will always require
> >> additional code that doesn't actually add any benefits.
> >
> > The benefit comes in when trying to troubleshoot unexpected behavior.
> 
> Okay.

OK, I've applied the below locally.  (And I'll fix up the linux server
patch.)

--b.