[nfsv4] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis-06.txt

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Fri, 21 June 2024 12:53 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DC31C14F736; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:53:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.105
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.105 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CcASFsqWTMuf; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x32f.google.com (mail-ot1-x32f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF549C14F739; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x32f.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6f9b4d69f53so1021079a34.0; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:53:07 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1718974387; x=1719579187; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=lZcwkJsa7pLINRzoGqtTPuvBpR6p6AD+abXpzdOzJlw=; b=Bp3UPynPhusTfjzEwJxdBFrK5KBWsAvhGLSHmvwIU1tHibCVCKF6VJ0B/hsFpqzzZ0 vUORIek7jAX7RL7XkhXzOJCJ+TbeS8mnTYSVP/rjVJBSboxHFLMdkx2uO2MMcsh7jjSo 55VxUF62PQVBNvak/piXMRfo3X526ExQdOFMRoQkHbblchHCKnZTBWOJpch8pcfarGZO StLqpJ0YSSXRqo05JcrHtA+MxMWg/v1glj3/TTUCyHsVqwwLui8F8aCkoJRVg+5I2Qp+ 7MxFss2v+kYo080GrlQXDJShxZnoaYCgUDHkE85GB6aK1mp+l6CfOrmQpWa+pkN9jE2s 1HMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1718974387; x=1719579187; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=lZcwkJsa7pLINRzoGqtTPuvBpR6p6AD+abXpzdOzJlw=; b=AlrQYEWr+eupnFqsGvp7dqQk6ameawhy2g7uU/VXdFuyOIDY5m1Uaa9jqxLD01gVyb NsT89EZjSbQXVUsrmmMHRCKfclT2txdX1xgRF9sKwY5WOn9KzjAfVsl+oil1SzJdErmK 18ptDrZiHtLGmd4Ip5FPB1qefK1QNGl2RPtex4E/GJ7D2WOUihh4KEK4XOOBAVVFOB8B 05aw6Gs+esnpH4jXUhVPxy/SYX6NcSrtXVTnX1BYLZuqEBgLinFd/CAjlSgdL5RCbkem yQgRnpBlEWD8EmY5pifN2Y0gBSFeogFQOC2uX03sYHoFR24twbvG/Yb2wNP0fcjfc82R fjIQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyoK6rIWLgbusPgLA4Uq8fWq3IhjQp0sqXuvyY93ZxGUGGOI8Vh amL238BLeeMil+XPXnAV/hsfj8U1vbpmc9pt6TBbqzcBK4l3rEmJn6WWKMF1mLDmqF9KB9n/7xy SYuTlOEFdPpLq+JsyhFdms0XN9CnKmQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFUzT9YEZVeOk879GTR50ihA2dL0mi++BuR8FXAJxOKPZ1rny7J3CYR/5gmftv/nACnq7XDxqjVlvvSB9rlWfc=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:3d19:b0:6f9:6299:1175 with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-700748c94e5mr8258250a34.13.1718974386848; Fri, 21 Jun 2024 05:53:06 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <171897226207.103841.10569998443848308765@dt-datatracker-6cc478f489-rscq2>
In-Reply-To: <171897226207.103841.10569998443848308765@dt-datatracker-6cc478f489-rscq2>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2024 08:52:56 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jckqmbKSFFtytEk8=Z+_RMu+L8y6RzYx77bE-_ROxB9-w@mail.gmail.com>
To: nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <zahed.sarker.ietf@gmail.com>, Rick Macklem <rick.macklem@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b4cd41061b65e96f"
Message-ID-Hash: B6MC64UK6ZKONIVG2LBDEF2JIO6JNGJ6
X-Message-ID-Hash: B6MC64UK6ZKONIVG2LBDEF2JIO6JNGJ6
X-MailFrom: davenoveck@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-nfsv4.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [nfsv4] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis-06.txt
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/39ccb08Zi-PNZdNP_cRN4vZR6mE>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nfsv4-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-leave@ietf.org>

Just when you thought it was safe to go in the water again!

The changes in this rfc5661bis-06 are just a preview of what you will see,
early next week, in acls-04 and rfc5662bis-03.

The quick summary is that, as a result of discussions with Rick, I
have seen the important gaps between the core UNIX ACL model and the draft
POSIX ACL model.  Given that accommodating the latter was an important goal
of the approach taken to ACLs in RFC3530, I have concluded that the failure
of the existing treatment to provide sufficient  support for *either *the
larger NFSv4 ACL model or the draft POSIX ACL model is of sufficient
gravity to consider the gaps defects that justify some
protocol extensions.  The details will be in acls-04.

I hope that, as a result, we will be able to provide reasonable support for
the draft POSIX ACL model within NFSv4.1, although some client work will be
necessary to do mapping and filtering in order to working within the
framework of the existing XDR.  Regarding Rick's desire for a more
draft-POSIX-friendly  approach there would be room for that as a v4.2
extension and I will discuss  some possibilities in that regard in a new
Appendix C in acl-04.  Stay tuned.

---------- Forwarded message ---------
From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, Jun 21, 2024 at 8:18 AM
Subject: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis-06.txt
To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
Cc: <nfsv4@ietf.org>


Internet-Draft draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis-06.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Network File System Version 4 (NFSV4) WG of the IETF.

   Title:   Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol
   Author:  David Noveck
   Name:    draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis-06.txt
   Pages:   744
   Dates:   2024-06-21

Abstract:

   This document describes the Network File System (NFS) version 4 minor
   version 1, including features retained from the base protocol (NFS
   version 4 minor version 0, which is specified in RFC 7530) and
   protocol extensions made subsequently.  The later minor version has
   no dependencies on NFS version 4 minor version 0, and was, until
   recently, documented as a completely separate protocol.

   This document is part of a set of documents which collectively
   obsolete RFCs 8881 and 8434.  In addition to many corrections and
   clarifications, it will rely on NFSv4-wide documents to substantially
   revise the treatment of protocol extension, internationalization, and
   security, superseding the descriptions of those aspects of the
   protocol appearing in RFCs 5661 and 8881.

The IETF datatracker status page for this Internet-Draft is:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis/

There is also an HTML version available at:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis-06.html

A diff from the previous version is available at:
https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661bis-06

Internet-Drafts are also available by rsync at:
rsync.ietf.org::internet-drafts


_______________________________________________
nfsv4 mailing list -- nfsv4@ietf.org
To unsubscribe send an email to nfsv4-leave@ietf.org