Re: [nfsv4] New version of sparse draft (draft-hildebrand-nfsv4-read-sparse-01.txt)

"Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com> Thu, 30 September 2010 16:05 UTC

Return-Path: <matt@linuxbox.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201623A6C4D for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:05:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.348
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.348 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.163, BAYES_05=-1.11, J_CHICKENPOX_47=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A57-7LhOa4ld for <nfsv4@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aa.linuxbox.com (aa.linuxbox.com [134.215.213.37]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A498F3A6C7F for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:05:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com (thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com [10.1.1.55]) by aa.linuxbox.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/SuSE Linux 0.7) with ESMTP id o8UG6WQV002786; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:06:32 -0400
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B40C3FC83A2; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:06:32 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at linuxbox.com
Received: from thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iGJ0kLyKCsQX; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:06:31 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com (thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com [10.1.1.55]) by thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17DA3FC83A1; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:06:30 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:06:30 -0400
From: "Matt W. Benjamin" <matt@linuxbox.com>
To: Dean Hildebrand <seattleplus@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <1981929510.115.1285862790532.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
In-Reply-To: <70330975.111.1285862759550.JavaMail.root@thunderbeast.private.linuxbox.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.1.1.213]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 6.0.5_GA_2180.CentOS5_64 (ZimbraWebClient - FF3.0 (Linux)/6.0.5_GA_2180.CentOS5_64)
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (aa.linuxbox.com [10.1.1.1]); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:06:32 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: nfsv4@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] New version of sparse draft (draft-hildebrand-nfsv4-read-sparse-01.txt)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:05:49 -0000

Hi,

"""
In addition, when a data server is returning a
   READ4reshole structure, it should still contain the offset and length
   of the next allocated block in the file, even if that block is not
   located on that particular data server.
"""

I had the impression that there could be valid pnfs implementations for which this might be an onerous requirement.  Is that not the case?

Matt

----- "Dean Hildebrand" <seattleplus@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> I uploaded a new version of our internet draft "Simple and Efficient
> Read Support for Sparse Files".
> 

-- 

Matt Benjamin

The Linux Box
206 South Fifth Ave. Suite 150
Ann Arbor, MI  48104

http://linuxbox.com

tel. 734-761-4689
fax. 734-769-8938
cel. 734-216-5309