Re: [nfsv4] PS Re: Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning-09: (with COMMENT)

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Fri, 26 May 2017 18:05 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1903129B22; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:05:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.698
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.698 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KBWNys08W-0C; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io0-x22c.google.com (mail-io0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24D5E129B19; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id o12so13935735iod.3; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=FZh1MTesO5/Sd7WleDeeQFCFMeMQTkhpJt+dCom9rV4=; b=r/6J3MmVgLU9dQ9fsZlN6jmBOM6GFAWgkkJbuLYORZjQ6R/1PhK3dDpmJbPf4baKJ4 4btjN5Z8T3/Q2lqtJgk7kIFb+gDuUQgzD1KM/xsdvKX6ImupK6TvFtH+h2rxiqT2MP40 6wOWNnUFcoPq3B58Qiv/NY5yOyhWROJi7rIfFYDhDziHpDbqSP5bg1jwJmbcLyjj/7Bi BhqxItPgnp9Re8bk7bUw7otONMGtJx+eI/hz/8eekD7L/7Q599CMBP0Vj9VCBLnLVmPf evc2iZ4NtNIY2bWIgIy4Dr5QP5t0Mnf1uj5FgFKRNpApf+maizQ1gmUK/7PyfMHXqowe K6Sg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=FZh1MTesO5/Sd7WleDeeQFCFMeMQTkhpJt+dCom9rV4=; b=ayNuzRuK+XWs+r4eJPFSNnXKZcwE3yq4l5UGTlAvzAh/+2HhhRKOegJe76ijt2KBer ahYhmGknsCcNb2gUHIzqYPMi5y+CisIV0W5QeZmQOmZyRZHzMZW5zaBGT7t05AGGVb/M DfhTENJAjAM4AwPJoBKGSi6jQzAaQZd65t+fC70A2WJBwjUCj5NqmjGQeTrwezBf7wKR smGgITMthzqxMVCvDjBRG7YAWdBv//RlRu2IKJyUf062qGNhMTpYzS8T59dKY4L5/udL 9fdeAHUSa2PlYsaS+i5U041RVvAdCtfjMXmyz2JMFcacb8GMP7B7WC6782ZrvxZtB47V /GOA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcDcnQ/d02snt7aUeRjHoHg4ul2M8WlpdDvYZe4albZLXQgkYssq BhlAJe5/jc1dfKT5aycOjxBzt6kA0w==
X-Received: by 10.107.143.148 with SMTP id r142mr3141315iod.137.1495821932481; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.4.148 with HTTP; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.107.4.148 with HTTP; Fri, 26 May 2017 11:05:32 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <86lgpjv6nq.fsf_-_@athyra.us.oracle.com>
References: <149459980428.13464.2287524739238339362.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1494602246.10434.3.camel@gmail.com> <CAKKJt-c=K-V0OPX3gk1bFGG9qwKTYuULn-ANd=7=fy=sZ5r_mA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKKJt-fzBMPAcvubV7EecOfQLM_QLBKbc3uK_gc1dH=tU=nTPw@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jc9JjaUCNeTrhKAWPoUpQzvaMp-sXXBtkUD0PeoP+GTbQ@mail.gmail.com> <86zidzv88s.fsf@athyra.us.oracle.com> <86lgpjv6nq.fsf_-_@athyra.us.oracle.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 14:05:32 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jfkzh4bbfjGF5tXiqSzGoWb2Wtj=X0Ltv295+8T4V+Lug@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mike Kupfer <mike.kupfer@oracle.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, nfsv4@ietf.org, "nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org" <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>, draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c05a28eeed2ac0550712e44"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/3VmhtZahnIegDFftuFROTohTwtU>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] PS Re: Spencer Dawkins' Yes on draft-ietf-nfsv4-versioning-09: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 18:05:34 -0000

I'll fix these in the next iteration, originally targeted at fixing my
merge screwups.

On May 26, 2017 2:01 PM, "Mike Kupfer" <mike.kupfer@oracle.com> wrote:

> I noticed a couple editorial nits that -10 introduced.  I'm told that
> since WGLC has ended, I need the broad cc above.  Anyway, it'd be nice
> if we could get these fixed prior to publication as an RFC, especially
> the first one.
>
> Section 4.4.2: "When minor version" -> "When the minor version"
>
> Section 6: "RFC defining" -> "RFC that defines"
>
> mike
>