[nfsv4] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with COMMENT)
Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 03 July 2020 09:50 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8460E3A0B90;
Fri, 3 Jul 2020 02:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org,
David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>, davenoveck@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.7.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <159376981406.23976.3823367265505746988@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:50:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/4sgCyuB0_9D70qWZBP2hn6Z-79M>
Subject: [nfsv4] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?=
=?utf-8?q?f-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>,
<mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>,
<mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 09:50:15 -0000
Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for the work put into this document. Please find below a couple on non-blocking COMMENTs. I hope that this helps to improve the document, Regards, -éric == COMMENTS == -- Abstract -- As section 4.2 specifies the use of at least server-side authenticated TLS session, I wonder why the abstract contains 'opportunistic encryption'. -- Section 4.1 -- "(D)TLS-protected RPC" while DTLS was never expanded before... or did I miss it ? -- Section 6.3 -- Just puzzled by "No comments from implementors" about Hammerspace while one author is affiliated with Hammerspace.
- [nfsv4] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-… Éric Vyncke via Datatracker
- Re: [nfsv4] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-i… Chuck Lever
- Re: [nfsv4] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-i… Eric Vyncke (evyncke)