[nfsv4] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with COMMENT)

Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Fri, 03 July 2020 09:50 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietf.org
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8460E3A0B90; Fri, 3 Jul 2020 02:50:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke_via_Datatracker?= <noreply@ietf.org>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls@ietf.org, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>, davenoveck@gmail.com
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.7.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke?= <evyncke@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <159376981406.23976.3823367265505746988@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 02:50:14 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/4sgCyuB0_9D70qWZBP2hn6Z-79M>
Subject: [nfsv4] =?utf-8?q?=C3=89ric_Vyncke=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-iet?= =?utf-8?q?f-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jul 2020 09:50:15 -0000

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below a couple on non-blocking COMMENTs.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

-- Abstract --
As section 4.2 specifies the use of at least server-side authenticated TLS
session, I wonder why the abstract contains 'opportunistic encryption'.

-- Section 4.1 --

"(D)TLS-protected RPC" while DTLS was never expanded before... or did I miss it
?

-- Section 6.3 --
Just puzzled by "No comments from implementors" about Hammerspace while one
author is affiliated with Hammerspace.