[nfsv4] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: (with COMMENT)

[Éric Vyncke via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Éric Vyncke has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rpc-tls/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thank you for the work put into this document.

Please find below a couple on non-blocking COMMENTs.

I hope that this helps to improve the document,

Regards,

-éric

== COMMENTS ==

-- Abstract --
As section 4.2 specifies the use of at least server-side authenticated TLS
session, I wonder why the abstract contains 'opportunistic encryption'.

-- Section 4.1 --

"(D)TLS-protected RPC" while DTLS was never expanded before... or did I miss it
?

-- Section 6.3 --
Just puzzled by "No comments from implementors" about Hammerspace while one
author is affiliated with Hammerspace.