Re: [nfsv4] IETF 78 NFSv4 session currently schedule for Wednesday afternoon - 1-3:30pm

On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 12:44 -0500, Tom Haynes wrote:
> On 07/ 6/10 12:01 PM, Noveck_David@emc.com wrote:
> > Making progress on v4.2 sounds sensible but I don't see allocating a large portion of 85 minutes to what might turn out to be an unstructured discussion of possible additions to NFSv4.2 (assuming that we are now OK as far as this being on the working group's charter).
> 
> Which we should clarify.
> 
> I think Spencer did that in
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/nfsv4/current/msg07833.html
> 
> >   We could certainly use up the time but I don't see that more than 20 minutes would be useful in trying to come up with a proposed "final" list for group discussion.
> >
> > If people have proposed additions, I should think that they would be able to put together a few slides and propose it as part of the meeting, before this 20-minute session.  I think that that session should be filtering things already proposed and not accumulating last-minute proposals.
> >
> >
> >    
> 
> I thought we had a current proposal:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-eisler-nfsv4-minorversion-2-requirements-02.txt
> 
> And I seem to recall Mike asking us to approve that in Anaheim.
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4

I'm not going to be at Masstricht or Bejing but I'd like to mention that
I'm still committed to the Labeled NFS work which is in the 4.2
requirements document under the compliance section.

Dav