[nfsv4] draft blackout periods and virtual interims.

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Fri, 26 June 2020 13:36 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634C93A0A3E; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:36:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qlSWYa4ZnROz; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ej1-x62d.google.com (mail-ej1-x62d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141A13A0A5F; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:36:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ej1-x62d.google.com with SMTP id w6so9409651ejq.6; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:36:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WaahhGhGiG+mRnnHx5BW4pIJKkoW0IeALhEI4nIM+1s=; b=fx1smIWmw80VYOu62YjGYOtDzdbpQJvh2i4X8Xi24bvefhdU2JAjn4ox2GxQZm3041 60dE6vFUSzYH00VPXrgQ4GYEhp3nVSS5bgxRMux0FwZkQcA7GZocZNxwwsoAUY45NPtl I4BhaHgekIohLayCz9v9SeFDx4Yn8MICb4th6ksJFkp3Z4f+AhaviWYGWwSF+oQDuX52 Z2RXEA70erD4lHtdrHavYVX+Ty+kRiPmGtl9XjcTTKq2BWof8/Q8wMD1tWjDb05t4cC0 MeKGn39iniQw74oViCltGKGaZvepDf6DkopLPM2YN3BMDF3i1couvJkpcfOiBx3HEfrZ Bk+g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=WaahhGhGiG+mRnnHx5BW4pIJKkoW0IeALhEI4nIM+1s=; b=raG2x873Ie9BhyapqTEq1Aen4iNg/+rb11cRsEr2HzhA5bVVKePiaOXsQoJbNcufAD t3zCd2udaHdV2u4FwMfwzVV5Ke1PvrPnGeb8s6n5XSuPH4oXMbV5Iw/wf1gog3fEtsY0 GGbWbKm/gR2PqK82FAPBTOFxXixUd32YUtNsL3Oi4eZj4ptgk+j8vEy4A3GjXTGiKlS5 0lBp4CIua3JO1l1Aw871gYIwVnVhZfFWu2UdwCQeAu5NWnQfSZMnHguxjXm5n7mDlf0t rHa5nxk6LmGOnkcNO41CBeP2AcdIlNEwnbQikk4nMOPOUKdpGfFxBbZ5+ejSXwBswAnO eG2Q==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531dYFlvoJXec5P9ePwjtYkwcODPWnB++JT5eLR3AQJOoSS1DCkR XtMQNdx2SSSQCb26MdKEsHYeNuQ1wctKqtXcfFo=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw6WCIKoJEBGAyxb5IO5a+Aofe95pdKm6KNJRPBFqud/WuORBQVfNOLljgZPvMUAJynRgsoRUbk83s5JMcckUo=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:40f5:: with SMTP id no5mr2533748ejb.149.1593178614550; Fri, 26 Jun 2020 06:36:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 09:36:43 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jfpkuMNz43jYWShahJ9b5Y2Nuoxdv7z8E6cOoTjxyDvLw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Cc: nfsv4-chairs <nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org>, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006255b805a8fccd79"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/8J_VyS4ldRTVq04mERljZa_PWeM>
Subject: [nfsv4] draft blackout periods and virtual interims.
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2020 13:36:58 -0000

> [sf] We made some progress and Christophe did a first review and started a
> git where we checked the document and started the review. I am still
> waiting for a last review of David Black. I might post the draft as it is
> now (needs more cleanup) so the WG can start a review.

> I'd like that, but I think I have to check with Magnus to make sure there
is no rule preventing us from discussing a very recently submitted draft,
as there would be in the case in which we were meeting the
> week of IETF 108. Sigh.

I need to check to make sure we are safe, from a rules-compliance point of
view, in asking Sorin to post his latest drafts, so that we could discuss
it on 7/9.  If we can't do this, progress in this area is foing to be
impeded.   I feel that, since our goal here is to communicate, we might as
well just do that as soon as possible, but I realize the IETF might not