[nfsv4] Meetings in July or After

David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Sat, 06 June 2020 11:18 UTC

Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D086B3A078A for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 04:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Zq3xu9wBC-Tt for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 04:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com (mail-ed1-x530.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3959F3A0788 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Sat, 6 Jun 2020 04:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id e12so9504990eds.2 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:18:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Quo9kyKBswzEwFBBR4RXsWO0IonIj1pUTmZVsnE9YXE=; b=sXUg4WqFsnod5bQvAZkjVgLwSej/7sFBL9hQWkqjaoHXX07s0jyQc+NRwVuLUfcCb/ 8Q4VKzH6ZuHRB5ZskkzkMoHwOPA7WxvDa5eXIkBjWhYhH4u2CPyxcUk0H068o5JQq0i9 QyI9+8y87vdQOrGpnj5GO7A0teC7j4nfvc2InHmQLd/6GAc9NKtVH4OPxpsRG7GvdUQK kNYNXlVzjU9UJY2pVexmt0CQydpCX8g84P+fmLNovEHszTt6hyhTC7AppBE+f7vxy7kM 71qViczzdoqNslr5b/o3Vp9bKQZWZkHbZD/56wYjVPy9ZIvDeQra2kSd3AS6dFjEUf15 OjGQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Quo9kyKBswzEwFBBR4RXsWO0IonIj1pUTmZVsnE9YXE=; b=VL+rIe1K/8tjxApg2LikltopPj3Ie1Z+CSgr+WWl5ski2W438VjY3+jBKn1C3fUSkw UwWrLFuwrXS9aLazhWQIku8shzm73m2MurBAaJzKgDvxPul2tdYwawgi43tNagyvAo9M ra3ISw0bxHzjiBw2Vcgk6pddZl/ffuLi0hypn+Kx2Xz3xlkPYWBlc6tq/9Yd1xsq/56A ljL79hpo4fvA8wZS/z0AqyV6Gjhvn1DlsYft++R4gFMZCRB0/RUOjF1u7xnz+VoIdR0x ECGAeY6a3NtAplUnXJfeYHZ2+o7zYMr3B9x/yKhAoN4SkmlqIVgPR4PhSMdxCcNoggcO U/1g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532TM7jlOXACFpHejPfcHw2xsrGazSa5PsczBqhig6hBUqfJW5rB /s+Zr8gT3kwDigA6mEeS70Spj/xXCzKlZKoNjqUTVg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJydZGfbdk+E7Aal/8tQJup6cmX/xd5iVCJfnqiOXTzyj3zGp7xKM2KTm1Zl9ig4VcUJPlL8F12EE/HtH4LF0Nc=
X-Received: by 2002:a50:e606:: with SMTP id y6mr13811228edm.63.1591442282859; Sat, 06 Jun 2020 04:18:02 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 07:17:51 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jfmPzvW+Wer8hqrvQuqtAdji3pHjUJt-uVm2uX9-iqXAw@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>, Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f352da05a768872d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/CXltDw4BfyUwX8hu1ULza09qg_0>
Subject: [nfsv4] Meetings in July or After
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Jun 2020 11:18:08 -0000

It has been decided that IETF 108 will be virtual-only.  The good thing
about that is that it would allow wider participation, being cheaper and
safer than a trip to Madrid. There will be a fee, but it is much smaller
than onsite fees have been and should not pose an obstacle for most people.

What is likely to pose an obstacle is that it appears to have been decided
that virtual Madrid, will, like actual Madrid, be in CEST. This mean that
the latest 50-minute session will start at around 1600 CEST = 7AM PDT.  A
100-minute session would start even earlier.  Both of these are likely to
be difficult to schedule so I think we will wind up with one or more
virtual interim nfsv4wg meetings.

Meetings before the week of IETF 108 make sense but I'm not sure they will
be allowed. Meetings in the weeks after IETF 108 wind up conflicting with
August vacations but I'm not sure if that is all that important in present

I'd like to get input from the working group about:

   - Preferences for meeting dates and times including discussion of dates
   to avoid.

   - Information about what you want to hear discussed and and what you are
   topcis you are willing to present about or lead a focused discussion of.
    Although I'm not clear about meeting numbers and format, I think it makes
   sense for us have coverage of both current working group items and new
   ideas as well.

I'll be sending out my own ideas on things to discuss next week.   If we
don't want a meeting slot within IETF108 proper, as I believe is the case,
we don't have to worry about the 6/12 session request cutoff.   Still, I'd
like us to get a clear idea about this meeting cycle relatively quickly so
I'd aprreciate it we had people's input on topics within the next few weeks