Re: [nfsv4] NFSv4 Charter change proposal

Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com> Wed, 08 July 2020 16:24 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@talpey.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9861D3A0F06 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:24:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.895
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.895 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q7cDUnSEW7oB for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from p3plsmtpa12-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net (p3plsmtpa12-04.prod.phx3.secureserver.net [68.178.252.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EFB73A0F03 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Wed, 8 Jul 2020 09:24:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.0.78] ([24.218.182.144]) by :SMTPAUTH: with ESMTPSA id tCrZjgsw6dyOrtCrZjNElB; Wed, 08 Jul 2020 09:24:01 -0700
X-CMAE-Analysis: v=2.3 cv=df/+Ikfe c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=ugQcCzLIhEHbLaAUV45L0A==:117 a=ugQcCzLIhEHbLaAUV45L0A==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=48vgC7mUAAAA:8 a=3TDb4SIi7vs_ws-mOSEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=w1C3t2QeGrPiZgrLijVG:22
X-SECURESERVER-ACCT: tom@talpey.com
To: nfsv4@ietf.org
References: <1c46b13053661a78fb69ee8783f29130447eff63.camel@ericsson.com> <CADaq8jdubM5JoyKf3xM5Uis1OpBgDnBXPuAxSsQ-CKwUfM5obg@mail.gmail.com> <aa03c2a0-e7ce-0207-9002-03853db82c0f@talpey.com> <7c631f6a39de8c41b5853d83da9b7b876605febe.camel@ericsson.com> <HE1PR0702MB3772DDE23C6BCE6C3E73A19095670@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAEo7hJHg2v_SPW-Y5y6GY2+gwnt7deR1VpGzhP0KuGRinS1A=Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: Tom Talpey <tom@talpey.com>
Message-ID: <3dbaaa56-c8e1-768e-ca80-b93f04225e2c@talpey.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jul 2020 12:24:02 -0400
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CAEo7hJHg2v_SPW-Y5y6GY2+gwnt7deR1VpGzhP0KuGRinS1A=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfNnpQNIUKIHQpbC0laMOsxMLLRt9g//zhC8nYZjnx1Lu9c+OG2D5af+PGGCWjnnEvct/Ufck2CXoaaVU2ki6OodgUCvw289fY3SbL3AyATs0IyeI5Phh HnoUIFZ8MIj4xjstvsyAfIuD7i+KZs4wjAJr99CoFcCaF6dxhvOmxNF1
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/DoFr9PzBVofsK3C6S8IRJpxih9Q>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] NFSv4 Charter change proposal
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Jul 2020 16:24:04 -0000

Looks good but Flush is the most important operation so I suggest
placing it first:

   The WG will extend RDMA to enhance the Memory Placement operations
   such as Flush, Atomic Write and Validation using Integrity Signatures.

As for schedule, I'd suggest March-ish (8 months).

Tom.

On 7/8/2020 4:16 AM, Brian Pawlowski wrote:
> Seems reasonable to me - picks up David Black's clarifying wording we 
> seem to agree on, and gets specific on the RDMA focus at end.
> 
> Tom: Any wordsmithing on the RDMA paragraph at end?
> 
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 1:05 AM Magnus Westerlund 
> <magnus.westerlund=40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org 
> <mailto:40ericsson.com@dmarc.ietf.org>> wrote:
> 
>     Hi,
> 
>     Attached is a charter proposal that I think would resolve the RDMA Push
>     extension. Please go ahead and word smith.
> 
>     Cheers
> 
>     Magnus
>     _______________________________________________
>     nfsv4 mailing list
>     nfsv4@ietf.org <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
>     https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list
> nfsv4@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
>