IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [nfsv4] Adam Roach's No Objection on charter-ietf-nfsv4-05-00: (with COMMENT)

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 14 September 2017 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0981330A3; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:06:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GxuTweOCOgxQ; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yw0-x22d.google.com (mail-yw0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B9111321A4; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yw0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id r85so4767144ywg.1; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:06:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=LlXf++m3zXCfLuKmoUCksd8GMVxMWEljeVIDtmanYJw=; b=bQOnAyo+liXknUylByAf0I1NqtZwYhUwR91kmNbCQQcl4ZmRgo296VrVOe5ydhUJUe GWcsDy6s/ub/N2E02SSUWF3xg861PJ36pq2vsLi9Jjaa7TIaQQhEPTktZoEWV1JOGXrV huPfnfl6vER1w4YYezqJxj1d4nziVQMXxDNN/gdSFm+kJQrbqv8zzhugoEnb+Fwf5Xga hlBTqwjwlSiwyaSi6eAyLIE1cwodclN8anl1gQxYambHeoN+HRB05hYLcsFsGih9mqFX bFaonuYz9PrFprGZrtnvzX+X5kbA2Y9kJVU8N+uNLXYmJjJ97QqNWQFd+IkRS9pZjvuv XIQw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LlXf++m3zXCfLuKmoUCksd8GMVxMWEljeVIDtmanYJw=; b=DtGvTLjWtdkeOSGlsBk86IpiR8aHqjGQy+Pbdja3HZnOZVKs/NvBlObkG2kfMX8g6+ FegPz9pqdxgIH/6wZAylM/eluhYPujD8oxroLPhVUpxS13kWpAPMO5emYNVT1PDuS4Du mPbfXB+OO6q9WR7LpEN7On1bxdN77YtGcXb9urCiKsLt9vBsJX/hPzTQh+bLqAKwEfYf Z9VcD1NYgRdswlRYkN2St6nXYsb/kJkIbL4pKkLtWXQQAmL7RGW81SogNXWiir3nMzVx jR04yYtLUkECyz4mZ+NJo0Kq2JYAoXee3vpip3yLmOhrHnPWoOE7tmvaSb8zy6BGyyU8 Rz8w==
X-Gm-Message-State: AHPjjUjM4Z08gDZ3VMcyeQh+CpZPS0TdHa3XtDLoVrrXvJOozWpLZqrz xILMZmvjCEgSj8xHxyJ56XIh/IHyvHjIgIhczzg=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADKCNb61Y+kNmyfRbnyRbGeHmDe6s+MOumkC2Tf4j5vj1Q1uJ/gW0ae62gkr5/zizVHsX66SGAU4Yo7H/jlReRj1QF0=
X-Received: by 10.13.219.138 with SMTP id d132mr18173093ywe.204.1505361999127; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:06:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.37.2.15 with HTTP; Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <150535606118.12525.923445878023622975.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
References: <150535606118.12525.923445878023622975.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 23:06:38 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-c8FPjHVpMHDkoNrLkywOas+ec=RJcYaUHtLF1C0YkU=g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, nfsv4-chairs@ietf.org, NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114fa85c376b1805591e6787"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/ELIjDmQ48Q6TwiHw8iNqBXtjDLk>
Subject: Re: [nfsv4] Adam Roach's No Objection on charter-ietf-nfsv4-05-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2017 04:06:42 -0000

Hi, Adam,

On Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 9:27 PM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:

> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-nfsv4-05-00: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-nfsv4/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> I'm not sure which question is being asked, but I suppose that since I
> don't
> object to either, I'm going to ballot "No Objection."


1. My bad.

2. This is what happens when you charter more working groups than you
recharter. New charters automatically go for external review. Recharters
might, or might not, depending on the level of new work involved, and the
level of interest in other SDOs.

3. I would not expect this recharter to go for external review, but I could
reasonably have edited the ballot to SAY that. See 1. above.

Thanks for asking, of course.

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email