[nfsv4] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files-15

Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com> Thu, 04 January 2018 18:49 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: ietf@ietf.org, nfsv4@ietf.org, draft-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <151509179800.23726.16296513657477216313@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2018 10:49:58 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/FOvt5ixjPehDeeMtO5rrqSQwRFE>
Subject: [nfsv4] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nfsv4-flex-files-15

Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
Review result: Has Nits

I think the document is written very clear. Ready to move forward, except some
minor Nits. The document used "uids" and "gids" extensively.  I assume that
"uids" = "User IDs". How about "gids"? does it mean "Group IDs"? it will be
helpful to expand it at the first occurance in the document. In Section 2.2.2
(Examples of using uids & gids) (Page 9), why saying "owner and group are
modified.."? what does the value "1066" or "1067" represent (as the value
"1697" represents the UID of the user "loghyr")?

Linda Dunbar

[nfsv4] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-nfs… Linda Dunbar
Re: [nfsv4] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Thomas Haynes
Re: [nfsv4] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf… Linda Dunbar