[nfsv4] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01.txt
David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com> Sun, 04 August 2019 11:20 UTC
Return-Path: <davenoveck@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C862B120041 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 04:20:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cps2600Zixrw for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 04:20:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ot1-x331.google.com (mail-ot1-x331.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::331]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5F70120025 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Sun, 4 Aug 2019 04:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ot1-x331.google.com with SMTP id z23so54236794ote.13 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 04:20:40 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=4VsEtCuLIDOoBKTc2TAklgzTDuvxVipbKw77pU8POqc=; b=WaV4N9/l70HqHYgWrI/oOvUZkqA+cjCkZ/blz9g/UzVAHpIy5+UvcJ7xpyk7dX7s6t TqY49dJ10uLWThxz+z4K5pM4b2C6KYF5l0FqFhe3H7picJHy7tBgYtJ/P4FCQ9ZMiYJ5 aG7/bVSdJpnA7/Le5DFH1B8pIPq/TlPVYrPIHJ3sj+zXvszfrcNT0rHLur1HEaBsqImj 1VQ8urxA0vE2ydsxg12vHuJT6V1mUzBS18kkd23bTsJXu7JmmOydzckiZGdt/3guMf7K C+7OIOlSYiXkPrt8KfQ5K4Ai2dMEDu9aydGJVSyZyr1u+Y0e0t3O4jALDsXsWNfCqyG1 KOrA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=4VsEtCuLIDOoBKTc2TAklgzTDuvxVipbKw77pU8POqc=; b=raqxuzaXJuuOMv2T9qtqgIVm1OhZvMWy0xKBQkLLBjwE4r7cY03Fzp9FPXBk19gBDc DzclZnfHYLhjIV0JqusC+q3GiIHaRh4kMgTaHSmsWslEV6K1yOM/sRg3nYLZS2SOWGEc ssvKf4RWBR/pgDlq3FmInJ0B7ixyZQBTuhCuaJDRePTAw1Xreyd8L3Q7VNqD7b3Yu4/h kr4OaUQ6H7lw4bI/5B4ehOLJwZLoZjvdtVz0cjY3+vHy4EcwssHruMSdtZ+FG7kK37fw yGOBTCpShWvyYw+kcHbN97qQ2oeIatu6bME6JfCTyeFDMpieSoONdFWS+3gjnbSLE/bJ VTpg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVNyDYD04nJh4hgwUfNzraUlAwvTAtyng5OMZz1fRVAZdb2AR4r mDzEWsTxGLrHgN0Lp5ovaUIkSCjNLt3rjKQyLkeiBZTUChE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqygzpBbgbFX2FaZo5+Ev/98nBKtnZ1vJQTqA2Gc4CnIcc3bIkHhKes6Zyzd2TULq5Znd7aBH9FS2njlrHERccE=
X-Received: by 2002:a9d:70d3:: with SMTP id w19mr46023064otj.208.1564917639895; Sun, 04 Aug 2019 04:20:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <156491582065.26467.7238000134100169463@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <156491582065.26467.7238000134100169463@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 07:20:29 -0400
Message-ID: <CADaq8jcDMJWtDnVuLKUx07MGSZ-mBOH0cNTRykp2gEKe8J4cuQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000760c9058f48c836"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/JFFgQ7ijmX2hBdZtUFnLSVXDAxA>
Subject: [nfsv4] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01.txt
X-BeenThere: nfsv4@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4/>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4>, <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 04 Aug 2019 11:20:44 -0000
I've just submitted the -01 of rfc5661sesqui-msns. The small set of changes from -00 reflect the discussion at IETF105, including Tom's suggeston that we might address some of the remaining issues in rfc5661 wth separate NFSv4-wide documents dealing with security and internationalization. I'm hoping to get the working group to give this document an apprpriate review so that we can proceed to discuss it with the IESG. Given that the substance of this document has already been reviewed by the working group (as draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update and as draft-ietf-nfsv4-msns-update), it is not clear what an appropriate review should entail. That decision is best left to each individual working group member, keeping in mind that it is best for us to focus that review on the parts that actually need review given that RFC5661 is already published and that the working group has already gone through WGLC for draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661-msns-update and draft-ietf-nfsv4-mv1-msns-update. A good way to do that, for those who have not yet reviewed the -00, is to base the review on an rfcdiff of this document and rfc5661, keeping in mind that the new section 11 is pretty much the same as the section 11 replacement in draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661-msns-update. In doing the rfcdiff there are a few things to take note of: - An rfcdiff of rfc5661 against draft-ietf-nfsv4-rf5661sesqui-msns-01.txt (produced with xml2rfc version 2) produces a number of spurious diffs, because version 2 formats some things differently than version 1 which produced rfc5661 (principally text tables). I've found it helpful to rfcdiff against a .txt produced using xml2rfc version 1 (at https://xml2rfc.tools.ietf.org/old.html). I have such a .txt file and will send it to anyone who asks. - A lot of differences show up only because of reference renumbering. Given that there are new normative references, all informative references get a new higher reference id given that rfc5661 was done with numeric references :-( - There is an annoying bug in rfcdiff that causes it to think (incorrectly) that the new .txt file has dropped sections 18.45 through the end of Section 19 and then ignore all the actualdiffs beyond that (e.g the new and changed appendices). I have sent mail to Henrik Lewkowetz, who apparently deals with issues in rfcdiff but some email communication issues have resulted in a situation in which it might be a while before the issue is fixed.. Luckily, it only screws up past the point where rfcdiff is useful in showing changes within the document. It is probably most useful to focus the review on the following sections which are either new or significantly changed from the corresponing sections in draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661-msns-update: - the Abstract (siginificantly revised from the one in rfc561) - Section 1.1, which is new. - Section 2.10.4 which has a significant update beyond the corresponding section in draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661-msns-update. - Section 11.6, which is new (i.e. it didn't appear in draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661-msns-update). - Section 22.1, which is new. - Appendices A, B, C which are new. - The Acknowledgments Section (was Appendix A; is now Appendix D) which has been restructured to include acknowledgments for both rfc5661 and the update. ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: <internet-drafts@ietf.org> Date: Sun, Aug 4, 2019 at 6:50 AM Subject: [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01.txt To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org> Cc: <nfsv4@ietf.org> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Network File System Version 4 WG of the IETF. Title : Network File System (NFS) Version 4 Minor Version 1 Protocol Authors : David Noveck Charles Lever Filename : draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01.txt Pages : 661 Date : 2019-08-04 Abstract: This document describes the Network File System (NFS) version 4 minor version 1, including features retained from the base protocol (NFS version 4 minor version 0, which is specified in RFC 7530) and protocol extensions made subsequently. The later minor version has no dependencies on NFS version 4 minor version 0, and is considered a separate protocol. This document obsoletes RFC5661. It substantialy revises the treatment of features relating to multi-server namesapce superseding the description of those features appearing in RFC5661. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns/ There are also htmlized versions available at: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01 A diff from the previous version is available at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqui-msns-01 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ _______________________________________________ nfsv4 mailing list nfsv4@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/nfsv4
- [nfsv4] I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661sesqu… internet-drafts
- [nfsv4] Fwd: I-D Action: draft-ietf-nfsv4-rfc5661… David Noveck