IETF Logo Mail Archive

[nfsv4] Re: Draft adoption call for WG - draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-03

Thomas Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com> Tue, 23 July 2024 15:08 UTC

Return-Path: <loghyr@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D48C151551 for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:08:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.109
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.109 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y4rTIkTSt-FI for <nfsv4@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pj1-x102f.google.com (mail-pj1-x102f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::102f]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADB09C151980 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pj1-x102f.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2cd487b5470so1327004a91.1 for <nfsv4@ietf.org>; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:08:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1721747329; x=1722352129; darn=ietf.org; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=VqgKAyIoOnWq4fWvXFmsGfxCNbBldnoHa3yd3UsVj4c=; b=iemfXgUT+7EuFlQsExZNUrkn8On9eP+glD8vIOb6vz3Z7SLBXGtOsiPY+Mlw2br3E2 c+rAhzJ93YTASF+oxLor6/6ip5lkC8RrIMJZGmvzBB1HxZu3HnraEF8S6c2yrjCkmnY0 4deCnbUig6+aur/++aPuwlM4pR5VkW0W9KS+IcOAm4Eb5vWfwNISruC+XI2MLOZSc3oe aclCNjpP2Xm6lF/NSjhXUY0rCL55XDGZUmex9QIhTr78aAYfR+uKC8hEMbQXde1I3qny giRp0j381Hqp4nVtcSnQ1Mesi/gY3XdecrVYAhX3UxFtcd/0gbV30PnObnaC7T2OU1Mh S5IA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1721747329; x=1722352129; h=to:references:message-id:content-transfer-encoding:cc:date :in-reply-to:from:subject:mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc :subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=VqgKAyIoOnWq4fWvXFmsGfxCNbBldnoHa3yd3UsVj4c=; b=SGkesDv6FGh05zi/RXI/MmYgcMXz8A0e/y82j2vLx2NB174bLOuFY6nPBUYj4jvsch ZzxGMvGZ6H4lwgeu++HD5RP9AxQKcy7yTlGZpVmzEbjFDzHDgWo019O2r8jBw3vlvDE6 IKQGdS5MSogU8000J0Niuou17q3DjVPPHzp7Ibzx1R80cn5amTHh+yDQPPaBNUuyoaEG pg9EHIXTUCGTfnrg7Kb3Q9u+lRjyJTZNN5NcEQbJbwYUFBInVLOj5vmpoWtsfl0uTv9y 6KsOFGenYx457GUkRKDX4zXIv8SwR/XbHeSC2ZUCSHKTs1hfZLo40UpyDy+H3NP6VE6p /PkA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx5/LqdCrkNGkWxzUR+7eTXd/GMYb/VwNobBUaeFSpl+dRlyeHu i5eAIqzoAkt0UuSBIepCh5gUV5gCcW+qidvxRLOIJnfIunLxa8Bb
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGvxQBJt2oth94/SefQNe6Jx2AD4I0xVG5XamDkHRaCXShcksidLVFjNjJRvZtbF647gzGVKw==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6081:b0:2cd:2c4d:9345 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2cd85c25254mr3243442a91.6.1721747328395; Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:08:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2601:647:4500:91:d849:8450:50e4:3801]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 98e67ed59e1d1-2ccf7b2adafsm9240014a91.2.2024.07.23.08.08.47 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:08:47 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\))
From: Thomas Haynes <loghyr@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <16481618-AAF4-43E3-B91A-B3EE4B461E30@cert.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 08:08:36 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <D504D47A-15BB-4C06-BDFC-C8499EE4009D@gmail.com>
References: <16481618-AAF4-43E3-B91A-B3EE4B461E30@cert.org>
To: Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62)
Message-ID-Hash: YIYQBJ5OIIDLRKW2KYN4BQILYTUT2674
X-Message-ID-Hash: YIYQBJ5OIIDLRKW2KYN4BQILYTUT2674
X-MailFrom: loghyr@gmail.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-nfsv4.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: NFSv4 <nfsv4@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc4
Precedence: list
Subject: [nfsv4] Re: Draft adoption call for WG - draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-03
List-Id: NFSv4 Working Group <nfsv4.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/nfsv4/JMBlPd27_4uKeqBI8DILH9jrzjw>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/nfsv4>
List-Help: <mailto:nfsv4-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:nfsv4-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:nfsv4@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:nfsv4-leave@ietf.org>


> On Jul 23, 2024, at 12:48 AM, Chris Inacio <inacio@cert.org> wrote:
> 
> Hello all,
> 
> The chairs are initiating an adoption for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4-rfc5662bis-03.
> 
> The chairs are interested in people supporting the adoption of this draft and are willing to provide any of the following:
> 
> * constructive text
> * Review
> 
> The chairs are also interested in hearing if anyone is opposed to adoption of this draft and a reason why the WG should not adopt it.
> 
> We will include time for discussion of adoption during IETF-120 and will close the adoption call reasonably soon after IETF-120.
> 
> Thanks
> NFSv4 Chairs
> _______________________________________________
> nfsv4 mailing list -- nfsv4@ietf.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to nfsv4-leave@ietf.org


Hi,

I’e asked this question a couple of times, why do we need a second bis for 5661 and 5662?

Also, why is 5661bis not 8881bis? 

Thanks,
Tom

v2.27.6 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status