Re: [nfsv4] Adoption call for draft-dnoveck-rfc5661bis

[David Noveck <[e-mail]>]

The adopted document is not available in the datatracker.  Please correct
this.

On Wed, Dec 14, 2022, 9:31 AM Brian Pawlowski <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Good day, apologies for the inexcusable delay.
>
> I have determined that *we have consensus* to take on the persona draft
> "draft-dnoveck-nfsv4 which is intended to be a standards-track describing
> nfsv4.1, obsoleting rfc8881" as a working group document, and on bringing
> in to working group *Chris Inacio will be the document editor*.
>
> Are there any questions?
>
> P.S. Remaining individual document decisions coming.
>
> -- Brian Pawlowski
> nfsv4 co-chair
>
>
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ---------
> From: David Noveck <[e-mail]>
> Date: Thu, Oct 13, 2022 at 1:58 PM
> Subject: Adoption call for draft-dnoveck-rfc5661bis
> To: NFSv4 <[e-mail]>
> Cc: nfsv4-chairs <[e-mail]>, <[e-mail]>
>
>
> This is an adoption call for draft-dnoveck-nfsv4 which is intended to be a
> standards-track describing nfsv4.1, obsoleting rfc8881.
>
> As it says in the abstract,
>
> -----
>
> This document describes the Network File System (NFS) version 4 minor
> version 1, including features retained from the base protocol (NFS version
> 4 minor version 0, which is specified in RFC7530) and protocol extensions
> made subsequently.  The later minor version has no dependencies on NFS
> version 4 minor version 0, and was , until recently, documented as a
> completely separate protocol.
>
> This document is part of a set of documents which collectively obsolete
> RFC 8881.  In addition to many corrections and clarification, it will rely
> on NFSv4-wide documents to substantially revise the treatment of protocol
> extension, internationalization, and security, superseding the description
> of those aspects of the protocol appearing in RFCs 5661 and 8881.
>
> -----
>
> The chairs would like to determine whether there is interest in adopting
> this document by the nfsv4 working group. The adoption call will run for
> two weeks and end on 10/26/2022 (UTC time). Please send any objections or
> expressions of support for adoption to the wg mailing list.
>
> As stated previously, since I am editor of this document, I will not be
> involved in making a judgment as to the existence of consensus.  It is
> expected that Brian will be doing this with Zahed available as a backup if
> circumstances do not allow Brian to do this job.
>